Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632505›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

The Intolerance of Uncertainty Inventory: Validity and Comparison of Scoring Methods to Assess Individuals Screening Positive for Anxiety and Depression.

Marco Lauriola, Oriana Mosca, Cristina Trentini, Renato Foschi, Renata Tambelli, R Nicholas Carleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Towards identifying a method of screening for autism amongst women with restrictive eating disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco LauriolaDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Oriana MoscaDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Cristina TrentiniDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Renato FoschiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Renata TambelliDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
R Nicholas CarletonDepartment of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intolerance of Uncertainty is a fundamental transdiagnostic personality construct hierarchically organized with a core general factor underlying diverse clinical manifestations. The current study evaluated the construct validity of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Inventory, a two-part scale separately assessing a unitary Intolerance of Uncertainty disposition to consider uncertainties to be unacceptable and threatening (Part A) and the consequences of such disposition, regarding experiential avoidance, chronic doubt, overestimation of threat, worrying, control of uncertain situations, and seeking reassurance (Part B). Community members (

Indexed as

anxietybifactor modelclinical validityconfirmatory factor analysisdepressionintolerance of uncertaintyIntolerance of Uncertainty Inventorytransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID29632505
PMCPMC5879456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.