ArticlePlant and soil2017
Arsenic methylation by a genetically engineered
Article in Plant and soil, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights into conventional and recent technologies for arsenic bioremediation: A systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Pooled it
- The key to arsenic pollution remediation: engineering and functional effects of arsenic-resistant microorganisms.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Genetic architecture of resistance to plant secondary metabolites in Photorhabdus entomopathogenic bacteria.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Community interactions among microbes give rise to host-microbiome mutualisms in an aquatic plant.mBio · 2024Article
- Microbes' role in environmental pollution and remediation: a bioeconomy focus approach.AIMS microbiology · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Legume-Rhizobial Symbiotic Interactions Beyond Nitrogen Fixation That Help the Host Survival and Diversification in Hostile Environments.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- The Anatomical Basis of Heavy Metal Responses in Legumes and Their Impact on Plant-Rhizosphere Interactions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Utilization of Legume-Nodule Bacterial Symbiosis in Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils.Biology · 2022Review
- In silico analysis of phylogeny, structure, and function of arsenite oxidase from unculturable microbiome of arsenic contaminated soil.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2021Article
- Molecular Biology in the Improvement of Biological Nitrogen Fixation by Rhizobia and Extending the Scope to Cereals.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Recent Developments in Microbe-Plant-Based Bioremediation for Tackling Heavy Metal-Polluted Soils.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Engineering bacterial symbionts of nematodes improves their biocontrol potential to counter the western corn rootworm.Nature biotechnology · 2020Article
- Microbial Arsenic Methylation in Soil and Uptake and Metabolism of Methylated Arsenic in Plants: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
- Review
- Glutathione S-Transferases: Role in Combating Abiotic Stresses Including Arsenic Detoxification in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsArsenic (As) is one of the most widespread environmental contaminants. The aim of our study was to test a novel bioremediation system based on the symbiosis between leguminous plant and genetically engineered rhizobia.
methodsThe arsenite [As(III)]
resultsUnder free-living conditions,
conclusionsThe present study demonstrates that engineered rhizobia expressing an algal
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.