ArticleScientific reports2018
The Scientific Basis and Advantage of Human Experiential Assessment in the quality control of Chinese Herbal Medicines exampling as Schisandrae Chinensis Fructus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The key issues and development strategy of Chinese Classical Formulas pharmaceutical preparations.Chinese medicine · 2021Review
- Identification of volatile active components in Acori Tatarinowii Rhizome essential oil from different regions in China by C6 glioma cells.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experiential quality assessment(EQA) is an important sensory analysis for judging herbal quality grades. Because of the high empirical utility of expert experience, the consistency, science and inheritance of such experience are continuously in dispute. To explore the scientific evidence for this subjective method, we designed a Delphi expert investigation coupled with chemical analysis to evaluate the quality of Schisandrae Chinensis Fructus (SCF). Initially, 13 experts were invited to independently evaluate the grades of 11 batches of SCF. After screening the consistency and repeatability of the evaluation results, typical samples of all quality levels were identified. Seven significant physical characters were detected; colour and size were found to be the key parameters for identifying SCF quality. Based on this correlation, a decision tree model was ultimately established and converted to a quality evaluation card. Over 80% consistency in a novice test demonstrated the technical advantages and application characteristics of the model. Further correlation analysis revealed that EQA quality grades of SCF were positively correlated to the content of polysaccharides and polyphenols, while negatively correlated to the content of lignans. Biological activities were also approving it. In summary, our study proves that subjective EQA is consistency, repeatability and could be inherited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.