Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632319›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2018

Too many targets, not enough patients: rethinking neuroblastoma clinical trials.

Jamie I Fletcher, David S Ziegler, Toby N Trahair, Glenn M Marshall, Michelle Haber, Murray D Norris

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Tumoricidal Activity and Side Effects of Radiolabeled Anti-NCAM [International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. KAP1 stabilizes MYCN mRNA and promotes neuroblastoma tumorigenicity by protecting the RNA mJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie I FletcherChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
David S ZieglerChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7451-7916
Toby N TrahairChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Glenn M MarshallChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Michelle HaberChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Murray D NorrisChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia. MNorris@ccia.unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUCancer Institute of New South Wales · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroblastoma is a rare solid tumour of infancy and early childhood with a disproportionate contribution to paediatric cancer mortality and morbidity. Combination chemotherapy, radiation therapy and immunotherapy remains the standard approach to treat high-risk disease, with few recurrent, actionable genetic aberrations identified at diagnosis. However, recent studies indicate that actionable aberrations are far more common in relapsed neuroblastoma, possibly as a result of clonal expansion. In addition, although the major validated disease driver, MYCN, is not currently directly targetable, multiple promising approaches to target MYCN indirectly are in development. We propose that clinical trial design needs to be rethought in order to meet the challenge of providing rigorous, evidence-based assessment of these new approaches within a fairly small patient population and that experimental therapies need to be assessed at diagnosis in very-high-risk patients rather than in relapsed and refractory patients.

Indexed as

3-IodobenzylguanidineAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalClinical Trials as TopicGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansImmunotherapyMembrane ProteinsMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeuroblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 113-IodobenzylguanidineAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicaldinutuximabGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNRAS protein, humanProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11PTPN11 protein, humanX-linked Nuclear Protein

Identifiers

PMID29632319
OpenAlexW2798190787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.