Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632263›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

The Min-protein oscillations in

Lukas Wettmann, Karsten Kruse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reprogrammed SimCells for antimicrobial therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Plasticity in the cell division processes of obligate intracellular bacteria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Topological braiding and virtual particles on the cell membrane.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Self-organization: the fundament of cell biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lukas WettmannTheoretische Physik, Universität des Saarlandes, Postfach 151150, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Karsten KruseDepartments of Biochemistry and Theoretical Physics, NCCR Chemical Biology, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland karsten.kruse@unige.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8665-2349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the rod-shaped bacterium

Indexed as

Cell DivisionCell Cycle ProteinsCell MembraneEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsMin proteinsprotein self-organizationreconstituted systems

Identifiers

PMID29632263
PMCPMC5904297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.