ArticleAnnals of family medicine2018
Practice Facilitators' and Leaders' Perspectives on a Facilitated Quality Improvement Program.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Federal Investment in Primary Care Transformation: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.JAMA health forum · 2025Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Planning and Delivering Tobacco Control Interventions in the United States from 2000 to 2020: Frameworks, Intervention Characteristics, and Health Equity Considerations.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Article
- Addressing Cardiovascular Risk in People With Psoriatic Disease Using a Care Coordinator Model: A Qualitative Analysis of a Pilot Study.Journal of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis · 2024Article
- Augmenting project ECHO for opioid use disorder with data-informed quality improvement.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2023Article
- Barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of improvement coaching: A qualitative evidence synthesis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2023Review
- Identifying Contextual Factors and Strategies for Practice Facilitation in Primary Care Quality Improvement Using an Informatics-Driven Model: Framework Development and Mixed Methods Case Study.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Findings and lessons learnt implementing a cardiovascular disease quality improvement program in Australian primary care: a mixed method evaluation.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Implementation of Community-Based Resource Referrals for Cardiovascular Disease Self-Management.Annals of family medicine · 2020Article
- Practice level factors associated with enhanced engagement with practice facilitators; findings from the heart health now study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Mixed method evaluation of Relational Team Development (RELATED) to improve team-based care for complex patients with mental illness in primary care.BMC psychiatry · 2019Article
- Qualitative evaluation of a cardiovascular quality improvement programmereveals sizable data inaccuracies in small primary care practices.BMJ open quality · 2019Article
- Technical Assistance for Primary Care Practice Transformation: Free Help to Perform Unpaid Labor?Annals of family medicine · 2018Article
- The Capacity of Primary Care for Improving Evidence-Based Care: Early Findings From AHRQ's EvidenceNOW.Annals of family medicine · 2018Article
- Contrasting Perspectives of Practice Leaders and Practice Facilitators May Be Common in Quality Improvement Initiatives.Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare QualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePractice facilitation is a promising approach to helping practices implement quality improvements. Our purpose was to describe practice facilitators' and practice leaders' perspectives on implementation of a practice facilitator-supported quality improvement program and describe where their perspectives aligned and diverged.
methodsWe conducted interviews with practice leaders and practice facilitators who participated in a program that included 35 improvement strategies aimed at the ABCS of heart health (aspirin use in high-risk individuals, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking cessation). Rapid qualitative analysis was used to collect, organize, and analyze the data.
resultsWe interviewed 17 of the 33 eligible practice leaders, and the 10 practice facilitators assigned to those practices. Practice leaders and practice facilitators both reported value in the program's ability to bring needed, high-quality resources to practices. Practice leaders appreciated being able to set the schedule for facilitation and select among the 35 interventions. According to practice facilitators, however, relying on practice leaders to set the pace of the intervention resulted in a lower level of program intensity than intended. Practice leaders preferred targeted assistance, particularly electronic health record documentation guidance and linkages to state smoking cessation programs. Practice facilitators reported that the easiest interventions were those that did not alter care practices.
conclusionsThe dual perspectives of practice leaders and practice facilitators provide a more holistic picture of enablers and barriers to program implementation. There may be greater opportunities to assist small practices through simple, targeted practice facilitator-supported efforts rather than larger, comprehensive quality improvement projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.