ArticleAnnals of family medicine2018
The Alarming Rate of Major Disruptive Events in Primary Care Practices in Oklahoma.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Federal Investment in Primary Care Transformation: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.JAMA health forum · 2025Pooled it
- A Randomized Trial of External Practice Support to Improve Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care.Annals of family medicine · 2019Trial
- Implementing a Tribally Engaged Lung Cancer Screening Pilot Program in Rural Oklahoma.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Econometric evaluation of implementing a behavioral health integration intervention in primary care settings.Translational behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- Fidelity evaluation of the compared procedures for conducting the PVS-PREDIAPS implementation strategy to optimize diabetes prevention in primary care.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- The Capacity of Primary Care for Improving Evidence-Based Care: Early Findings From AHRQ's EvidenceNOW.Annals of family medicine · 2018Article
- The Effects of Major Disruptions on Practice Participation in Facilitation During a Primary Care Quality Improvement Initiative.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
- What AHRQ Learned While Working to Transform Primary Care.Annals of family medicineArticle
- Effects of Practice Turnover on Primary Care Quality Improvement Implementation.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical QualityArticle
- Assessing Disruption Impact on Quality Improvement Activities Designed to Improve HPV Vaccination in Rural Primary Care.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn primary care practices, sustainability of performance improvements and ability to deliver continuity of care to patients can be adversely affected by major disruptive events, such as relocations and changes in ownership, clinicians, and key staff. This study documented the rates of major disruptive events in a cohort of primary care practices in Oklahoma.
methodsPractices were included if they had existed for 1 year before enrollment and remained in the project for at least 1 year after enrollment. Practice characteristics for 208 practices and major disruptive events during the preenrollment year were collected by survey. Postenrollment major disruptive events were prospectively collected by practice facilitators. We compiled frequency statistics and conducted bivariate analyses for each data set.
resultsOf 208 eligible practices, 81 (39%) were clinician owned, and 51 (25%) were health system owned. One hundred nine practices (52%) were in nonmetropolitan counties. One hundred seventy-five major disruptive events occurred in 120 (58%) practices during the preenrollment year, with 42 practices having experienced multiple events. During the first year of the project, 89 major disruptive events occurred in 67 (32%) practices, with 20 practices experiencing multiple events. The major disruptive events reported most often during both periods were loss of personnel and implementation of electronic health records and billing systems. Practice size was associated with occurrence of these events.
conclusionsDuring a 2-year period, major disruptive events occurred at an alarming rate, adversely affecting quality improvement efforts. Most reported events involved losses of clinicians and staff. More research is needed to identify and address the root causes of these events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.