Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632226›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2018

The Alarming Rate of Major Disruptive Events in Primary Care Practices in Oklahoma.

James W Mold, Margaret Walsh, Ann F Chou, Juell B Homco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of Practice Turnover on Primary Care Quality Improvement Implementation.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James W MoldOklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma jameswmold@att.net.
Margaret WalshUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Ann F ChouUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Juell B HomcoUniversity of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI JUDITH A JAMES · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
Disseminating and Implementing PCOR through the Oklahoma Primary Healthcare Extension SystemR18HS023919 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI DUFFY, F DANIEL · 2015 to 2017
$15.0M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS023919NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn primary care practices, sustainability of performance improvements and ability to deliver continuity of care to patients can be adversely affected by major disruptive events, such as relocations and changes in ownership, clinicians, and key staff. This study documented the rates of major disruptive events in a cohort of primary care practices in Oklahoma.

methodsPractices were included if they had existed for 1 year before enrollment and remained in the project for at least 1 year after enrollment. Practice characteristics for 208 practices and major disruptive events during the preenrollment year were collected by survey. Postenrollment major disruptive events were prospectively collected by practice facilitators. We compiled frequency statistics and conducted bivariate analyses for each data set.

resultsOf 208 eligible practices, 81 (39%) were clinician owned, and 51 (25%) were health system owned. One hundred nine practices (52%) were in nonmetropolitan counties. One hundred seventy-five major disruptive events occurred in 120 (58%) practices during the preenrollment year, with 42 practices having experienced multiple events. During the first year of the project, 89 major disruptive events occurred in 67 (32%) practices, with 20 practices experiencing multiple events. The major disruptive events reported most often during both periods were loss of personnel and implementation of electronic health records and billing systems. Practice size was associated with occurrence of these events.

conclusionsDuring a 2-year period, major disruptive events occurred at an alarming rate, adversely affecting quality improvement efforts. Most reported events involved losses of clinicians and staff. More research is needed to identify and address the root causes of these events.

Indexed as

OwnershipHumansOklahomaPersonnel TurnoverPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplacecontinuity of caredisruptionselectronic health recordsimplementationprimary carequality improvementturmoil

Identifiers

PMID29632226
PMCPMC5891314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.