Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632193›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Symbiont selection via alcohol benefits fungus farming by ambrosia beetles.

Christopher M Ranger, Peter H W Biedermann, Vipaporn Phuntumart, Gayathri U Beligala, Satyaki Ghosh, Debra E Palmquist, Robert Mueller, Jenny Barnett, Peter B Schultz, Michael E Reding and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The mutualistic fungi of the bark beetleISME communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mutualism and division of labour: a mutual expansion of concepts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Flexibility in the ambrosia symbiosis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Christopher M RangerHorticultural Insects Research Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Wooster, OH 44691; christopher.ranger@ars.usda.gov peter.biedermann@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Peter H W BiedermannDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany; christopher.ranger@ars.usda.gov peter.biedermann@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4234-5659
Vipaporn PhuntumartDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403.
Gayathri U BeligalaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403.
Satyaki GhoshDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403.
Debra E PalmquistUS Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Midwest Area, Peoria, IL 61604.
Robert MuellerDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Jenny BarnettHorticultural Insects Research Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Wooster, OH 44691.
Peter B SchultzHampton Roads Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia Beach, VA 23455.
Michael E RedingHorticultural Insects Research Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Wooster, OH 44691.
J Philipp BenzSchool of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, D-85354 Freising, Germany.
Agricultural Research Service · USBowling Green State University · USAgricultural Research Service - Midwest Area · USMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEVirginia Cooperative Extension · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal-microbe mutualisms are typically maintained by vertical symbiont transmission or partner choice. A third mechanism, screening of high-quality symbionts, has been predicted in theory, but empirical examples are rare. Here we demonstrate that ambrosia beetles rely on ethanol within host trees for promoting gardens of their fungal symbiont and producing offspring. Ethanol has long been known as the main attractant for many of these fungus-farming beetles as they select host trees in which they excavate tunnels and cultivate fungal gardens. More than 300 attacks by

Indexed as

AnimalsAspergillusColeopteraEthanolPenicilliumSymbiosisEthanolfungus-farming insectshost screeninginsect–fungus mutualismplant–insect–microbe interactionssymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29632193
PMCPMC5924889
OpenAlexW2797405644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.