Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29631990›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Diabetes-Specific Formulae Versus Standard Formulae as Enteral Nutrition to Treat Hyperglycemia in Critically Ill Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Ra'eesa Doola, Alwyn S Todd, Josephine M Forbes, Adam M Deane, Jeffrey J Presneill, David J Sturgess

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Nutritional Values of Teff (Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ra'eesa DoolaDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-2815
Alwyn S ToddMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-4391
Josephine M ForbesMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5595-8174
Adam M DeaneDepartment of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-5577
Jeffrey J PresneillDepartment of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-7667
David J SturgessMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-0038
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUGriffith University · AUMater Health Services · AUThe University of Queensland · AUTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring critical illness, hyperglycemia is prevalent and is associated with adverse outcomes. While treating hyperglycemia with insulin reduces morbidity and mortality, it increases glycemic variability and hypoglycemia risk, both of which have been associated with an increase in mortality. Therefore, other interventions which improve glycemic control, without these complications should be explored. Nutrition forms part of standard care, but the carbohydrate load of these formulations has the potential to exacerbate hyperglycemia. Specific diabetic-formulae with a lesser proportion of carbohydrate are available, and these formulae are postulated to limit glycemic excursions and reduce patients' requirements for exogenous insulin.

objectiveThe primary outcome of this prospective, blinded, single center, randomized controlled trial is to determine whether a diabetes-specific formula reduces exogenous insulin administration. Key secondary outcomes include the feasibility of study processes as well as glycemic variability.

methodsCritically ill patients will be eligible if insulin is administered whilst receiving exclusively liquid enteral nutrition. Participants will be randomized to receive a control formula, or a diabetes-specific, low glycemic index, low in carbohydrate study formula. Additionally, a third group of patients will receive a second diabetes-specific, low glycemic index study formula, as part of a sub-study to evaluate its effect on biomarkers. This intervention group (n=12) will form part of recruitment to a nested cohort study with blood and urine samples collected at randomization and 48 hours later for the first 12 participants in each group with a secondary objective of exploring the metabolic implications of a change in nutrition formula. Data on relevant medication and infusions, nutrition provision and glucose control will be collected to a maximum of 48 hours post randomization. Baseline patient characteristics and anthropometric measures will be recorded. A 28-day phone follow-up will explore weight and appetite changes as well as blood glucose control pre and post intensive care unit (ICU) discharge.

resultsRecruitment commenced in February 2015 with an estimated completion date for data collection by May 2018. Results are expected to be available late 2018.

conclusionsThis feasibility study of the effect of diabetes-specific formulae on the administration of insulin in critically ill patients and will inform the design of a larger, multi-center trial.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR):12614000166673; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12614000166673 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xs0phrVu).

Indexed as

enteral formulaglucoseglycemic controllow carbohydratenutritiontube formula

Identifiers

PMID29631990
PMCPMC5913570
OpenAlexW2797856710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.