Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29631491›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2018

The Evolution of Polystyrene as a Cell Culture Material.

Max J Lerman, Josephine Lembong, Shin Muramoto, Greg Gillen, John P Fisher

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 254 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Robust Chemical-free Platform for Age-SynchronizedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Biomaterials science · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Engineering in vitro vascular microsystems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An In Situ Characterisation Method for 3-D Electrospun Foams.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Max J Lerman1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland , College Park, Maryland.
Josephine Lembong3 NIH/NIBIB Center for Engineering Complex Tissues, University of Maryland , College Park, Maryland.
Shin Muramoto2 Surface and Trace Chemical Analysis Group, Materials Measurement Lab, National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Greg Gillen2 Surface and Trace Chemical Analysis Group, Materials Measurement Lab, National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg, Maryland.
John P Fisher3 NIH/NIBIB Center for Engineering Complex Tissues, University of Maryland , College Park, Maryland.
Material Measurement Laboratory · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB023833 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polystyrene (PS) has brought in vitro cell culture from its humble beginnings to the modern era, propelling dozens of research fields along the way. This review discusses the development of the material, fabrication, and treatment approaches to create the culture material. However, native PS surfaces poorly facilitate cell adhesion and growth in vitro. To overcome this, liquid surface deposition, energetic plasma activation, and emerging functionalization methods transform the surface chemistry. This review seeks to highlight the many potential applications of the first widely accepted polymer growth surface. Although the majority of in vitro research occurs on two-dimensional surfaces, the importance of three-dimensional (3D) culture models cannot be overlooked. The methods to transition PS to specialized 3D culture surfaces are also reviewed. Specifically, casting, electrospinning, 3D printing, and microcarrier approaches to shift PS to a 3D culture surface are highlighted. The breadth of applications of the material makes it impossible to highlight every use, but the aim remains to demonstrate the versatility and potential as both a general and custom cell culture surface. The review concludes with emerging scaffolding approaches and, based on the findings, presents our insights on the future steps for PS as a tissue culture platform.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionPrinting, Three-DimensionalAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesHumansPolymersPolystyrenesTissue EngineeringPolymersPolystyrenes3D printingcustom fabricationelectrospinningplasma treatmentpolystyrenesurface chemical modification

Identifiers

PMID29631491
PMCPMC6199621
OpenAlexW2797304017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.