ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2018
Migration of spinal pedicle screw with aerodigestive perforation and subsequent device expectoration.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal fixation is a common surgical procedure. Frequently, fixation for spinal stabilization requires use of instrumentation such as pedicle screws and fixation plates. Aerodigestive and vascular perforations from such procedures are infrequent albeit known complications from these procedures. PRESENTATION OF CASE: This case details an uncommon situation in which a patient with anterior cervical spine fixation in the distant past was found to have a migratory pedicle screw. The patient had symptoms of neck pain and dysphagia. Radiographic studies were helpful in demonstrating the problem. While undergoing a physical examination, the patient was witnessed to expectorate the screw. Further work up with panendoscopy was undertaken and the patient managed conservatively. DISCUSSION: The upper aerodigestive system rarely experiences perforation from spinal stabilization hardware. When it occurs, management should include a dedicated investigation of the involved portions of the digestive system to avoid further complication.
conclusionThis case presents an rare occurrence of aerodigestive perforation of a spinal pedicle screw which was self-removed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.