Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29630889›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2018

Use of raloxifene and tamoxifen by breast cancer risk level in a Medicare-eligible cohort.

Paul F Pinsky, Eric Miller, Brandy Heckman-Stoddard, Lori Minasian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul F PinskyDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: pinskyp@mail.nih.gov.
Eric MillerDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Brandy Heckman-StoddardDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Lori MinasianDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000057INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201600007C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRaloxifene and tamoxifen are Food and Drug Administration-approved for breast cancer risk reduction; in 2013, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended these drugs for breast cancer risk reduction in high-risk women. Information on the use of raloxifene and tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction in the general population indicates that the risk is believed to be low; however, there is little literature.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the use of breast cancer risk reduction medications by breast cancer risk level in an older cohort of women. STUDY

designWomen who were enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial were assessed for the use of raloxifene, tamoxifen, and other medications. The data sources for use of the drugs were a mailed medication use questionnaire in 2013 and linked Medicare Part D claims files from 2010-2014. Estimated breast cancer risk within 5 years was assessed with the use of the modified Gail model and self-reported breast cancer risk factors; comorbidities were assessed through a questionnaire.

resultsA total of 22,235 women completed the medication use questionnaire; of these, 13,640 women (61%) had linked Part D data. In 2013, 45% of the women were 65-74 years old, and 55% of the women were 75-84 years old. From the medication use questionnaire, raloxifene use (past month) was 1.8%, 2.5%, and 4.0% for women with breast cancer risk within 5 years of <1.66%, 1.66-3.0%, and ≥3%, respectively (probability value trend, <.0001). From Part D, for any use during the period among women with coverage, raloxifene rates were 3.3%, 4.0%, and 6.6% for the 3 categories for breast cancer risk within 5 years (probability value trend, <.0001); use was 7.4% and 3.3% in women with and without osteoporosis, respectively. Raloxifene use significantly decreased from 2010-2014, and specifically from 2012-2014, both for all women and for women with breast cancer risk within 5 years of ≥3%. Tamoxifen use from Part D was 0.36%, 0.45%, and 0.85% for the 3 categories for breast cancer risk within 5 years (probability value trend, .009).

conclusionRaloxifene use was low overall but increased modestly with breast cancer risk, and usage decreased from 2010-2014. Tamoxifen use was very low.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaChemopreventionCohort StudiesEstrogen AntagonistsFemaleHumansMedicareMedicare Part DRaloxifene HydrochlorideRisk AssessmentTamoxifenUnited StatesEstrogen AntagonistsRaloxifene HydrochlorideTamoxifenbreast cancerchemopreventionraloxifenerisktamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID29630889
PMCPMC5970073
OpenAlexW2796161097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.