Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29630852›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2018

The Max Clinic: Medical Care Designed to Engage the Hardest-to-Reach Persons Living with HIV in Seattle and King County, Washington.

Julia C Dombrowski, Meena Ramchandani, Shireesha Dhanireddy, Robert D Harrington, Allison Moore, Matthew R Golden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Implementation of Low-Barrier Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care: Lessons Learned From the Max Clinic in Seattle.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia C Dombrowski1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Meena Ramchandani1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Shireesha Dhanireddy1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Robert D Harrington1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Allison Moore3 Public Health-Seattle & King County HIV/STD Program , Seattle, Washington.
Matthew R Golden1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Low-Threshold Incentivized HIV Care for Persons with Substance Use DisordersR03DA042668 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOMBROWSKI, JULIA COOK · 2016 to 2017
$309k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA042668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Max Clinic in Seattle, Washington is designed to engage patients who have extensive barriers to HIV care. In this article, we describe the clinic's evolution and outcomes of patients enrolled in the first 2 years. The clinic is a high-intensity, low-threshold, incentivized care model that includes walk-in access to primary care in a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic. Patients who have failed to engage in care and achieve viral suppression with lower intensity support are referred by clinicians, case managers, and the health department Data to Care program. The clinic offers food vouchers, cash incentives, no-cost bus passes, and cell phones, as well as intensive case management with cross-agency coordinated care. The primary evaluation outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved viral suppression (HIV RNA <200 copies/mL) at least once after enrollment. Secondary outcomes were continuous viral suppression (≥2 suppressed results in a row ≥60 days apart) and engagement in care (≥2 completed medical visits ≥60 days apart). During January 2015-December 2016, 263 patients were referred; 170 (65%) were eligible, and 95 (56% of eligible) were enrolled. Most patients used illicit drugs or hazardous levels of alcohol (86%) and had diagnosed psychiatric illness (72%) and unstable housing (65%). During the year after enrollment, 90 (95%) patients engaged in care. As of the end of 2016, 76 (80%) had achieved viral suppression, and 54% had continuous viral suppression. The Max Clinic successfully treated HIV in high-need patients and, to date, has been sustainable through a combination of federal, state, and local funding.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareProgram DevelopmentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCase ManagementFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CarePublic Health SurveillanceViral LoadWashingtoncare deliveryhigh-need patientsHIV care continuumPublic Health Departmentretention in caresubstance use

Identifiers

PMID29630852
PMCPMC5905858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.