Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29630478›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2018

Modulation of Differentiation Processes in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells Exposed to Parabolic Flight-Induced Acute Hypergravity and Microgravity.

Aviseka Acharya, Sonja Brungs, Margit Henry, Tamara Rotshteyn, Nirmala Singh Yaduvanshi, Lucia Wegener, Simon Jentzsch, Jürgen Hescheler, Ruth Hemmersbach, Helene Boeuf and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The individual and combined effects of spaceflight radiation and microgravity on biologic systems and functional outcomes.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aviseka Acharya1 Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany .
Sonja Brungs2 German Aerospace Center, Institute of Aerospace Medicine , Gravitational Biology, Cologne, Germany .
Margit Henry1 Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany .
Tamara Rotshteyn1 Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany .
Nirmala Singh Yaduvanshi1 Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany .
Lucia Wegener2 German Aerospace Center, Institute of Aerospace Medicine , Gravitational Biology, Cologne, Germany .
Simon Jentzsch2 German Aerospace Center, Institute of Aerospace Medicine , Gravitational Biology, Cologne, Germany .
Jürgen Hescheler1 Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany .
Ruth Hemmersbach2 German Aerospace Center, Institute of Aerospace Medicine , Gravitational Biology, Cologne, Germany .
Helene Boeuf3 INSERM-U1026, BioTis, University of Bordeaux , Bordeaux, France .
Agapios Sachinidis1 Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic developmental studies under microgravity conditions in space are very limited. To study the effects of short-term altered gravity on embryonic development processes, we exposed mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) to phases of hypergravity and microgravity and studied the differentiation potential of the cells using wide-genome microarray analysis. During the 64th European Space Agency's parabolic flight campaign, mESCs were exposed to 31 parabolas. Each parabola comprised phases lasting 22 s of hypergravity, microgravity, and a repeat of hypergravity. On different parabolas, RNA was isolated for microarray analysis. After exposure to 31 parabolas, mESCs (P31 mESCs) were further differentiated under normal gravity (1 g) conditions for 12 days, producing P31 12-day embryoid bodies (EBs). After analysis of the microarrays, the differentially expressed genes were analyzed using different bioinformatic tools to identify developmental and nondevelopmental biological processes affected by conditions on the parabolic flight experiment. Our results demonstrated that several genes belonging to GOs associated with cell cycle and proliferation were downregulated in undifferentiated mESCs exposed to gravity changes. However, several genes belonging to developmental processes, such as vasculature development, kidney development, skin development, and to the TGF-β signaling pathway, were upregulated. Interestingly, similar enriched and suppressed GOs were obtained in P31 12-day EBs compared with ground control 12-day EBs. Our results show that undifferentiated mESCs exposed to alternate hypergravity and microgravity phases expressed several genes associated with developmental/differentiation and cell cycle processes, suggesting a transition from the undifferentiated pluripotent to a more differentiated stage of mESCs.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell DifferentiationSignal TransductionAnimalsCell LineEmbryoid BodiesHypergravityMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsWeightlessnessdifferentiationembryonic stem cellshypergravitymicrogravityparabolic flighttranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29630478
PMCPMC5995265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.