Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29630439›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Immunogenicity and safety of a second booster dose of an acellular pertussis vaccine combined with reduced antigen content diphtheria-tetanus toxoids 10 years after a first booster in adolescence: An open, phase III, non-randomized, multi-center study.

Martina Kovac, Lusiné Kostanyan, Narcisa Mesaros, Sherine Kuriyakose, Meera Varman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01738477 (Evaluation of Immunogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals' Tdap Booster Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01738477 phase3completednot on this map

Evaluation of Immunogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals' Tdap Booster Vaccine (Boostrix™) in Young Adults, Administered 10 Years After Previous Tdap Boosting

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2013 to 2014Enrolled165ConditionsTetanus, Acellular Pertussis, DiphtheriaArmsBoostrix
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Martina Kovaca GSK, Vaccines, Wavre , Belgium.
Lusiné Kostanyanb XPE Pharma & Science , Wavre , Belgium, Belgium.
Narcisa Mesarosa GSK, Vaccines, Wavre , Belgium.
Sherine Kuriyakosec GSK Vaccines , Bangalore , India.
Meera Varmand Pediatric Infectious Disease, Creighton University , Omaha , NE , United States.
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BECreighton University · USGlaxoSmithKline (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pertussis is a highly contagious disease, for which periodic peaks in incidence and an increasing number of outbreaks have been observed over the last decades. The reduced-antigen-content tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) can be used to boost individuals aged ≥10 years, vaccinated in infancy with a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), to reduce pertussis morbidity and maintain protection against diphtheria and tetanus throughout adolescence and adulthood. This phase III, open-label, non-randomized, multicenter follow-up study (NCT01738477) enrolled 19-30-year-old participants from the United States who had received booster vaccination 10 years earlier with either Tdap (Tdap group) or Td (Td group). In total, 128 (Tdap group) and 37 (Td group) participants received Tdap vaccination. After administration of Tdap, all participants were seroprotected (antibody concentrations ≥0.1 international units [IU]/ml) against diphtheria and tetanus. Immune responses to a second Tdap dose in the Tdap group were shown to be non-inferior to responses elicited by a first Tdap dose in the Td group for diphtheria and tetanus and to a 3-dose DTaP vaccination during infancy for pertussis antigens (primary objectives). Post-booster vaccination, all participants in both groups had antibody concentrations above assay cut-offs and antibody geometric mean concentrations increased by 3.8-15.5-fold compared to pre-booster levels for all antigens. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the Td (80.6%) and Tdap (85.6%) groups (no serious adverse events reported). A Tdap dose administered after previous Td or Tdap vaccination was shown to be immunogenic and well-tolerated in young adults, supporting repeated vaccination with Tdap at 10-year intervals.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineAdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialDiphtheriaDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesFatigueFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeadacheHumansImmunization, SecondaryIncidenceInjection Site ReactionMaleAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccinesdecennial boosterdiphtheriapertussistetanusvaccination

Identifiers

PMID29630439
PMCPMC6149833
OpenAlexW2797346081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.