ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2018
Systematic Assessment of Well-Being in Mice for Procedures Using General Anesthesia.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activity as a readout parameter for neurobehavioral research and severity assessment in laboratory rodents: a systematic comparison and meta-analysis of measurement techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- A model-specific simplification of the Mouse Grimace Scale based on the pain response of intraperitoneal CClScientific reports · 2022Article
- Effects of separated pair housing of female C57BL/6JRj mice on well-being.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The impact of tethered recording techniques on activity and sleep patterns in rats.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- The IntelliCage System: A Review of Its Utility as a Novel Behavioral Platform for a Rodent Model of Substance Use Disorder.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Review
- The impact of handling technique and handling frequency on laboratory mouse welfare is sex-specific.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Reliability of the Mouse Grimace Scale in C57BL/6JRj Mice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Measurement of Fecal Testosterone Metabolites in Mice: Replacement of Invasive Techniques.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Article
- Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal's perspective.PloS one · 2020Article
- Assessing Affective State in Laboratory Rodents to Promote Animal Welfare-What Is the Progress in Applied Refinement Research?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Review
- A novel multi-parametric analysis of non-invasive methods to assess animal distress during chronic pancreatitis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Impact of repeated anesthesia with ketamine and xylazine on the well-being of C57BL/6JRj mice.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In keeping with the 3R Principle (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) developed by Russel and Burch, scientific research should use alternatives to animal experimentation whenever possible. When there is no alternative to animal experimentation, the total number of laboratory animals used should be the minimum needed to obtain valuable data. Moreover, appropriate refinement measures should be applied to minimize pain, suffering, and distress accompanying the experimental procedure. The categories used to classify the degree of pain, suffering, and distress are non-recovery, mild, moderate, or severe (EU Directive 2010/63). To determine which categories apply in individual cases, it is crucial to use scientifically sound tools. The well-being-assessment protocol presented here is designed for procedures during which general anesthesia is used. The protocol focuses on home cage activity, the Mouse Grimace Scale, and luxury behaviors such as burrowing and nest building behavior as indicators of well-being. It also uses the free exploratory paradigm for trait anxiety-related behavior. Fecal corticosterone metabolites as indicators of acute stress are measured over the 24-h post-anesthetic period. The protocol provides scientifically solid information on the well-being of mice following general anesthesia. Due to its simplicity, the protocol can easily be adapted and integrated in a planned study. Although it does not provide a scale to classify distress in categories according to the EU Directive 2010/63, it can help researchers estimate the degree of severity of a procedure using scientifically sound data. It provides a way to improve the assessment of well-being in a scientific, animal-centered manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.