Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29630016›Full record

SynthesisObstetrics and gynecology2018

Opioid Detoxification During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Mishka Terplan, Hollis J Laird, Dennis J Hand, Tricia E Wright, Ashish Premkumar, Caitlin E Martin, Marjorie C Meyer, Hendrée E Jones, Elizabeth E Krans

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Associations between maternal opioid use disorder treatment and pregnancy outcomes.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Bringing MOUD "In House": Implementing an Internal MOUD Program During Pregnancy in a State Prison.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2026
    Article
  5. Hospital Care for Pregnant Persons With OUD Review.American journal of medicine open · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mishka TerplanDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; the Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Services, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Hollis J Laird
Dennis J Hand
Tricia E Wright
Ashish Premkumar
Caitlin E Martin
Marjorie C Meyer
Hendrée E Jones
Elizabeth E Krans
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Buprenorphine Assignment in Pregnancy: Objective CriteriaK23DA038789 · NIDA · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI KRANS, ELIZABETH E · 2016 to 2018
$497k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA038789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with opioid detoxification during pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from January 1, 1966, to September 1, 2016. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: English-language studies that reported outcomes associated with opioid detoxification among pregnant women with opioid use disorder were included. Nonoriginal research articles (case reports, editorials, reviews) and studies that failed to report outcomes for detoxification participants were excluded. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and quality was assessed using the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force Quality of Evidence scale. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND

resultsOf 1,315 unique abstracts identified, 15 met criteria for inclusion and included 1,997 participants, of whom 1,126 underwent detoxification. Study quality ranged from fair to poor as a result of the lack of a randomized control or comparison arm and high risk of bias across all studies. Only nine studies had a comparison arm. Detoxification completion (9-100%) and illicit drug relapse (0-100%) rates varied widely across studies depending on whether data from participants who did not complete detoxification or who were lost to follow-up were included in analyses. The reported rate of fetal loss was similar among women who did (14 [1.2%]) and did not undergo detoxification (17 [2.0%]).

conclusionsEvidence does not support detoxification as a recommended treatment intervention as a result of low detoxification completion rates, high rates of relapse, and limited data regarding the effect of detoxification on maternal and neonatal outcomes beyond delivery.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29630016
PMCPMC6034119
OpenAlexW2921530337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.