Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29629988›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2018

Early Evidence of Sepsis-Associated Hyperperfusion-A Study of Cerebral Blood Flow Measured With MRI Arterial Spin Labeling in Critically Ill Septic Patients and Control Subjects.

Marie-Hélène Masse, Marie Anne Richard, Frédérick D'Aragon, Charles St-Arnaud, Michael Mayette, Neill K J Adhikari, William Fraser, André Carpentier, Steven Palanchuck, David Gauthier and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05202938 (Energy MEtabolism of Septic Heart.), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05202938 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Energy MEtabolism of Septic Heart.

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de SherbrookeRan2022 to 2024Enrolled32ConditionsSeptic Shock, Chronic Heart FailureArmsultrasound cardiography, FDG PET scan, Palmitate PET scan, Acetate PET scan, Blood sampling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What is a Clinician to Do?Critical care medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Marie-Hélène MasseDepartment of Medicine/Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Marie Anne RichardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Frédérick D'AragonDepartment of Medicine/Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Charles St-ArnaudDepartment of Medicine/Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Michael MayetteDepartment of Medicine/Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Neill K J AdhikariDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
William FraserCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
André CarpentierCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Steven PalanchuckDepartment of Medicine/Division of Internal Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
David GauthierDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Luc LanthierDepartment of Medicine/Division of Internal Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Matthieu TouchetteDepartment of Medicine/Division of Internal Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Albert LamontagneDepartment of Medicine/Division of Neurology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Jean ChénardDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Sangeeta MehtaInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yanick SansoucyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Etienne CroteauCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Martin LepageCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
François LamontagneDepartment of Medicine/Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMechanisms underlying sepsis-associated encephalopathy remain unclear, but reduced cerebral blood flow, alone or in conjunction with altered autoregulation, is reported as a potential contributor. We compared cerebral blood flow of control subjects and vasopressor-dependent septic patients.

designRandomized crossover study.

settingMRI with arterial spin labeling. PATIENTS: Ten sedated septic patients on mechanical ventilation (four with controlled chronic hypertension) and 12 control subjects (six with controlled chronic hypertension) were enrolled. Mean ± SD ages were 61.4 ± 10.2 and 44.2 ± 12.8 years, respectively (p = 0.003). Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of septic patients at ICU admission was 27.7 ± 6.6.

interventionsTo assess the potential confounding effects of sedation and mean arterial pressure, we measured cerebral blood flow with and without sedation with propofol in control subjects and at a target mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg and greater than or equal to 75 mm Hg in septic patients. The sequence of sedation versus no sedation and mean arterial pressure targets were randomized. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsIn septic patients, cerebral blood flow measured at a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg (40.4 ± 10.9 mL/100 g/min) was not different from cerebral blood flow measured at a mean arterial pressure target of greater than or equal to 75 mm Hg (41.3 ± 9.8 mL/100 g/min; p = 0.65). In control subjects, we observed no difference in cerebral blood flow measured without and with sedation (24.8 ± 4.2 vs 24.9 ± 5.9 mL/100 g/min; p = 0.93). We found no interaction between chronic hypertension and the effect of sedation or mean arterial pressure targets. Cerebral blood flow measured in sedated septic patients (mean arterial pressure target 65 mm Hg) was 62% higher than in sedated control subjects (p = 0.001).

conclusionsIn septic patients, cerebral blood flow was higher than in sedated control subjects and did not vary with mean arterial pressure targets. Further research is required to understand the clinical significance of cerebral hyperperfusion in septic patients on vasopressors and to reassess the neurologic effects of current mean arterial pressure targets in sepsis.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationCritical IllnessAdultAgedBlood PressureBrainCase-Control StudiesCross-Over StudiesDeep SedationFemaleHumansHypertensionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingSpin Labels

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.