Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29629645›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2018

Development and application of two multiplex real-time PCR assays for detection and speciation of bacterial pathogens in the koala.

Lyndal S Hulse, Danica Hickey, Jessica M Mitchell, Kenneth W Beagley, William Ellis, Stephen D Johnston

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Koala Conservation: The Utility of Art and Genome Banking.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Detection and Characterisation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lyndal S HulseSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia (Hulse, Mitchell, Ellis, Johnston).
Danica HickeySchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia (Hulse, Mitchell, Ellis, Johnston).
Jessica M MitchellSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia (Hulse, Mitchell, Ellis, Johnston).
Kenneth W BeagleySchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia (Hulse, Mitchell, Ellis, Johnston).
William EllisSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia (Hulse, Mitchell, Ellis, Johnston).
Stephen D JohnstonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia (Hulse, Mitchell, Ellis, Johnston).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases have contributed to the decline in the health of koala ( Phascolarctos cinereus) populations in the wild in some regions of Australia. Herein we report the development and validation of 2 multiplex real-time PCR (rtPCR) panels for the simultaneous detection of Mycoplasma spp., Ureaplasma spp., Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Chlamydia, including speciation and quantification of Chlamydia, in ocular, reproductive, and nasal swab samples in addition to semen and male urogenital and reproductive tissues, from koalas. Each rtPCR panel was developed for use as a single-tube reaction using pathogen-specific primers and fluorescently labeled probe sets. DNA extracted from reference strains and isolates was used for validation of sequence gene targets for the multiplex rtPCR panels. Each panel was shown to be sensitive and specific in detecting and differentiating the bacterial pathogens. The multiplex rtPCR panels were used to screen clinical samples from free-ranging and hospitalized koalas for multiple pathogens simultaneously. The multiplex rtPCR will improve turnaround time compared to individual-pathogen rtPCR methods used, to date, for confirmation of diagnosis and will provide the wildlife clinician with the ability to make treatment decisions more rapidly.

Indexed as

PhascolarctidaeAnimalsBordetellaChlamydiaDNA PrimersFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsMaleMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionMycoplasmaQueenslandReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsUreaplasmaDNA PrimersBordetella bronchisepticaChlamydiakoalasmultiplex real-time PCRMycoplasmaUreaplasma

Identifiers

PMID29629645
PMCPMC6505923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.