Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29629393›Full record

ArticleBrain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)2017

Heading for new shores! Overcoming pitfalls in BCI design.

Ricardo Chavarriaga, Melanie Fried-Oken, Sonja Kleih, Fabien Lotte, Reinhold Scherer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Human factors engineering of brain-computer interface and its applications: Human-centered brain-computer interface design and evaluation methodology].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricardo ChavarriagaDefitech Chair in Brain-Machine Interface (CNBI), Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Melanie Fried-OkenOregon Health & Science University, Institute on Development and Disability, Portland, Oregon USA.
Sonja KleihInstitute of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Marcusstraße 9-11, Würzburg, 97070, Germany.
Fabien LotteInria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest/LaBRI, 200 avenue de la vieille tour, 33405, Talence cedex, France.
Reinhold SchererInstitute of Neural Engineering, BCI-Lab, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 16/IV, 8010 Graz, Austria.

Funding

Translational refinement of adaptive communication system for locked-in patientsR01DC009834 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED-OKEN, MELANIE · 2009 to 2024
$12.5M
ACL HHS 90RE5017NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in brain-computer interfaces has achieved impressive progress towards implementing assistive technologies for restoration or substitution of lost motor capabilities, as well as supporting technologies for able-bodied subjects. Notwithstanding this progress, effective translation of these interfaces from proof-of concept prototypes into reliable applications remains elusive. As a matter of fact, most of the current BCI systems cannot be used independently for long periods of time by their intended end-users. Multiple factors that impair achieving this goal have already been identified. However, it is not clear how do they affect the overall BCI performance or how they should be tackled. This is worsened by the publication bias where only positive results are disseminated, preventing the research community from learning from its errors. This paper is the result of a workshop held at the 6th International BCI meeting in Asilomar. We summarize here the discussion on concrete research avenues and guidelines that may help overcoming common pitfalls and make BCIs become a useful alternative communication device.

Indexed as

artifactsBCIEEGlimitationspublication biassignal processinguser centered designuser training

Identifiers

PMID29629393
PMCPMC5884128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.