Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29629319›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2018

Liver transplantation for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases in an era of transplant oncology.

Keita Shimata, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Taizo Hibi

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Research progress on liver transplantation therapy for hepatic metastases in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IV, Grade 1 and 2, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keita ShimataDepartment of Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yasuhiko SugawaraDepartment of Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Taizo HibiDepartment of Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) very often present with a metastatic disease at the first diagnosis. Liver transplantation (LT) for unresectable pNET with liver metastases (pNETLM) has been described to prolong survival in highly selected patients, although outcomes were worse than those of patients who underwent LT for gastrointestinal NETLM (GI-NETLM). In this review, several proposed criteria are described with their rationale and controversies. Most of the data used to establish these criteria do not reflect the recent improvements of non-surgical treatments that has changed the landscape of treatment for pNETs, including the development of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and molecular-targeted agents (sunitinib and everolimus). Properly designed studies are necessary to define the role of down-staging and bridging therapy prior to LT incorporating systemic chemotherapy using these molecular-targeted agents. Also, given the indolent nature of low or intermediate grade pNETs, the best endpoint to compare the efficacy of each treatment option for patients with pNETLM has yet to be determined. Lastly, the definition of "unresectable" remains ambiguous. The indication of the conventional technique of two-staged liver resection with portal vein embolization or the new technique of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy to expand the resectability of wide-spread metastatic liver tumors has been controversial. In an era of transplant oncology, LT should be the last resort for patients who are considered unresectable and otherwise untreatable after an exhaustive multidisciplinary team discussion by all experts in the field. In conclusion, although its long-term outcomes have been promising, the role of LT for unresectable pNETLM as a curative or palliative treatment remains unclear. A well-designed randomized control study is required to elucidate the clinical impact of LT for pNETLM.

Indexed as

Liver metastasisliver transplantation (LT)metastatic neuroendocrine tumorpancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET)transplant oncology

Identifiers

PMID29629319
PMCPMC5876682
OpenAlexW2783246105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.