Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29629222›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastric cancer2018

Survival Benefit of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Bang Wool Eom, Sohee Kim, Ja Yeon Kim, Hong Man Yoon, Mi-Jung Kim, Byung-Ho Nam, Young-Woo Kim, Young-Iee Park, Sook Ryun Park, Keun Won Ryu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastric cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Efficacy and safety of FLOT regimenResearch in pharmaceutical sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bang Wool EomCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-2051
Sohee KimBiometric Research Branch, Research Institute for National Cancer Control and Evaluation, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4660-6043
Ja Yeon KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hong Man YoonCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-7080
Mi-Jung KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-7590
Byung-Ho NamBiometric Research Branch, Research Institute for National Cancer Control and Evaluation, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Young-Woo KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-9672
Young-Iee ParkCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sook Ryun ParkCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4724-5016
Keun Won RyuCenter for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5935-9777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt has been reported that the survival of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is better in East Asia countries than in developed western countries; however, the prognosis of LAGC remains poor. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on the long-term survival of East Asia patients with LAGC. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom October 2006 through August 2008, 43 patients with LAGC received perioperative S-1 combined with weekly docetaxel in a phase II study (neoadjuvant group). These patients were matched using propensity scores to patients who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the same period (surgery group). The surgical outcomes and long-term survivals were compared between the 2 groups.

resultsAfter matching, 43 and 86 patients were included in the neoadjuvant and surgery groups, respectively, and there was no significant difference in their baseline characteristics. Although the operating time was longer in the neoadjuvant group, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the 2 groups. The neoadjuvant group had a significantly higher 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (73.3% vs. 51.1%, P=0.005) and a trend towards higher 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (62.8% vs. 49.9%, P=0.145). In the multivariate analysis, perioperative chemotherapy was an independent factor for OS, with a hazard ratio of 0.4 (P=0.005) and a marginal effect on the PFS (P=0.054).

conclusionsPerioperative chemotherapy was associated with better long-term survival without increasing postoperative complications in the setting of D2 surgery for patients with LAGC, suggesting that perioperative chemotherapy can be a therapeutic option in East Asia countries.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy AdjuvantNeoadjuvant therapyPropensity ScoreStomach neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID29629222
PMCPMC5881012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.