Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29629191›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2018

Chronic kidney disease care models in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

John W Stanifer, Megan Von Isenburg, Glenn M Chertow, Shuchi Anand

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06372743 (A Dual-centre, Two-arm, Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Integrated Collaborative Nurse-led Physician-supported Multimorbid Chronic Kidney Disease Care Model Versus Physician-led Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06372743 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Dual-centre, Two-arm, Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Integrated Collaborative Nurse-led Physician-supported Multimorbid Chronic Kidney Disease Care Model Versus Physician-led Care (INTEGREAT-CKD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandra HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled220ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseasesArmsINTEGREAT-CKD Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John W StaniferDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Megan Von IsenburgMedical Center Library, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Glenn M ChertowDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Shuchi AnandDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Duke University · USStanford University · US

Funding

Epidemiology and management of chronic kidney disease in South AsiansK23DK101826 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ANAND, SHUCHI · 2014 to 2018
$919k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK101826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe number of persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) living in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is increasing rapidly; yet systems built to care for them have received little attention. In order to inform the development of scalable CKD care models, we conducted a systematic review to characterise existing CKD care models in LMICs.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase and WHO Global Health Library databases for published reports of CKD care models from LMICs between January 2000 and 31 October 2017. We used a combination of database-specific medical subject headings and keywords for care models, CKD and LMICs as defined by the World Bank.

resultsOf 3367 retrieved articles, we reviewed the full text of 104 and identified 17 articles describing 16 programmes from 10 countries for inclusion. National efforts (n=4) focused on the prevention of end-stage renal disease through enhanced screening, public awareness campaigns and education for primary care providers. Of the 12 clinical care models, nine focused on persons with CKD and the remaining on persons at risk for CKD; a majority in the first category implemented a multidisciplinary clinic with allied health professionals or primary care providers (rather than nephrologists) in lead roles. Four clinical care models used a randomised control design allowing for assessment of programme effectiveness, but only one was assessed as having low risk for bias; all four showed significant attenuation of kidney function decline in the intervention arms.

conclusionsOverall, very few rigorous CKD care models have been reported from LMICs. While preliminary data indicate that national efforts or clinical CKD care models bolstering primary care are successful in slowing kidney function decline, limited data on regional causes of CKD to inform national campaigns, and on effectiveness and affordability of local programmes represent important challenges to scalability.

Indexed as

control strategieshealth services researchsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29629191
PMCPMC5884264
OpenAlexW2796396800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.