Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29629059›Full record

ArticleElectronic physician2018

Effect of oral ginger on prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Alireza Bameshki, Mohammad Hasan Namaiee, Ali Jangjoo, Maliheh Dadgarmoghaddam, Mohammad Hosein Eshaghi Ghalibaf, Atefeh Ghorbanzadeh, Shima Sheybani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electronic physician, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alireza BameshkiM.D., Anesthesiologist, Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University Of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Hasan NamaieeM.D., Resident of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ali JangjooM.D., Surgeon, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Maliheh DadgarmoghaddamM.D., Community Medicine Specialist, Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Hosein Eshaghi GhalibafB.Sc., Anesthetist Nurse, Department of Anesthesiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Atefeh GhorbanzadehMedical Student, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Shima SheybaniM.D., Cardiac Anesthesiologist, Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are among the most frequent complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Recently, some studies have shown ginger, as an herbal medicine, to be effective and safe in PONV prevention; however, there is no evidence of its efficacy in the Iranian population.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of oral ginger on PONV prevention after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

methodsThis double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed on women who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Imam Raza Hospital, Mashhad, Iran between April and November, 2016. Patients were divided randomly into two groups of G) intervention group (n=75, received 2 capsules containing 250 mg ginger) and P) placebo group (n=75, received 2 placebo capsules) one hour before surgery. Nausea severity and vomiting frequency were evaluated at 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after the operation. Data analysis was done by SPSS version 16.0 software with Chi-square test, Independent-sample-t-test, repeated measure ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test.

resultsThe two groups were homogenous in terms of age, gender and surgery duration. The severity of nausea was lower in the ginger group at the 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after the operation; however, these differences were statically significant only at 2 (p=0.034) and 12 hours (p=0.043). Although the incidence of vomiting was higher in the placebo group in the 2nd and 12th hours after surgery, the number of vomiting episodes in 2, 4, 6 and 12 hours after surgery was statistically similar in the two groups (p>0.05). The nausea severity was significantly changed during 12 hours of study in both groups (p=0.001), however the nausea severity was always lower in the ginger group (p=0.078).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that 500mg oral ginger one hour before surgery in women who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is effective in decreasing severity of PONV.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir) with the Irct ID: IRCT2016122222218N2.

fundingThe study was financially supported by Deputy of Research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyGingerLaparoscopicNauseaPostoperative Nausea and VomitingVomiting

Identifiers

PMID29629059
PMCPMC5878030
OpenAlexW2790822655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.