Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29629020›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular ultrasound2018

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity Related to Anti-Cancer Treatment in Clinical Practice: An Opinion Paper from the Working Group on Cardio-Oncology of the Korean Society of Echocardiography.

Hyungseop Kim, Woo-Baek Chung, Kyoung Im Cho, Bong-Joon Kim, Jeong-Sook Seo, Seong-Mi Park, Hak Jin Kim, Ju-Hee Lee, Eun Kyoung Kim, Ho-Joong Youn

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cardiovascular imaging in cardio-oncology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Advancing Cardio-Oncology in Asia.Korean circulation journal · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Hyungseop KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
Woo-Baek ChungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Kyoung Im ChoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Bong-Joon KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jeong-Sook SeoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Korea.
Seong-Mi ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hak Jin KimDepartment of Cardiology, Center for Clinical Specialty, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Ju-Hee LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
Eun Kyoung KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular and Stroke Imaging Center, Heart Vascular and Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ho-Joong YounDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Kosin University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRChungbuk National University Hospital · KRInje University Busan Paik Hospital · KRKorea University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular (CV) toxicity associated with anti-cancer treatment is commonly encountered and raises critical problems that often result in serious morbidity or mortality. Most cardiac toxicities are related to the cumulative dose of chemotherapy; however, the type of chemotherapy, concomitant agents, and/or conventional CV risk factors have been frequently implicated in CV toxicity. Approximately half of the patients exhibiting CV toxicity receive an anthracycline-based regimen. Therefore, serologic biomarkers or cardiac imagings are important during anti-cancer treatment for early detection and the decision of appropriate management of cardiotoxicity. However, given the difficulty in determining a causal relationship, a multidisciplinary collaborative approach between cardiologists and oncologists is required. In this review, we summarize the CV toxicity and focus on the role of cardiac imaging in management strategies for cardiotoxicity associated with anti-cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Anti-cancer treatmentCardio-oncologyCardiovascular toxicityEchocardiography

Identifiers

PMID29629020
PMCPMC5881080
OpenAlexW2794635194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.