ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches
Does Restrictive Fluid Strategy during Robotic Pelvic Surgeries Obtund Intraoperative Rise in Intraocular Pressure?
Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic pelvic surgeries require steep Trendelenburg position which may result in rise in intraocular pressure (IOP).
aimThe aim of this study was to compare the changes that occur in IOP during robotic pelvic surgeries in steep Trendelenburg position with a restrictive intravenous fluid administration. SETTINGS AND
designThis prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care institution. SUBJECTS AND
methodsTwenty consenting patients scheduled for pelvic robotic gynecological surgeries were enrolled. All patients received general anesthesia following a standardized protocol. IOP was measured before induction of anesthesia, immediately after induction and intubation, at the end of surgery immediately after making the patient supine and immediately after extubation. Ringer's lactate was administered intravenously at a rate of 4 mL/kg/h targeting a mean arterial pressure of >65 mmHg and urine output of >0.5 mL/kg/h. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired
resultsThere was a fall in IOP soon after induction from baseline which was not significant. Immediately, following intubation, there was a significant rise in IOP. At the end of surgery, though IOP remained high, it was not statistically significant. However, following extubation, IOP rose further and the difference from the baseline became statistically significant. Although there was a moderate increase in peak airway pressure and highest EtCO
conclusionDuring robotic pelvic surgeries, adopting a restrictive intravenous fluid strategy with the maintenance of normal end-tidal carbon dioxide levels could abate effects of steep Trendelenburg position on IOP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.