Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29628560›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches

Effect of Esmolol and Diltiazem Infusions on Hemodynamic Response to Pneumoperitoneum on Laparoscopic Simple Nephrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Alka Verma, Divya Srivastava, Mekhala Paul, Arindam Chatterjee, Abhilash Chandra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alka VermaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Divya SrivastavaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mekhala PaulDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arindam ChatterjeeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Abhilash ChandraDepartment of Nephrology, Dr. RML IMS, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INDr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have been conducted in search of appropriate drugs to attenuate hemodynamic responses in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but till date, no such study has been conducted on patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy.

aimThe study was designed to assess the effect of esmolol and diltiazem infusions on hemodynamic changes during routine laparoscopic transperitoneal simple nephrectomy. SETTINGS AND

designA prospective double-blinded randomized control trial. SUBJECTS AND

methodsA total of 120 nonhypertensive patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical Status I and II aged 20-60 years about to undergo laparoscopic nephrectomy were enrolled for the study after obtaining Institute Ethical committee approval. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups. Group I (control group) received 10 ml normal saline intravenously (i.v.) before induction of anesthesia, followed by continuous infusion 10-20 ml/h. Group II (esmolol group) received i.v. esmolol 1 mg/kg diluted in 10 ml similarly, followed by continuous infusion of 10-20 ml/h (5-10 μg/kg/min). Group III (diltiazem group) received i.v. diltiazem 0.2 mg/kg diluted in 10 ml before induction of anesthesia, followed by continuous infusion at 10-20 ml/h (0.08-1.25) μg/kg/min. After completion of surgery, all the infusions were stopped. Data recording were done for changes in hemodynamics throughout the surgery. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: was done using Chi-square test for categorical data and one-way ANOVA for continuous data. Tukey ("honestly significant difference")

resultsAll hemodynamic data: Heart rate (HR), systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were observed to be significantly higher (

conclusionBoth esmolol and diltiazem infusion provide stable intraoperative hemodynamics and protection against stress response triggered by pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy.

Indexed as

Diltiazemesmolollaparoscopic nephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID29628560
PMCPMC5872900
OpenAlexW2781558089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.