Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29628546›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches

Hemodynamic Responses and Safety of Sedation Following Premedication with Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl during Fiberoptic-assisted Intubation in Patients with Predicted Difficult Airway.

Sunil Rajan, Rittick Talukdar, Pulak Tosh, Jerry Paul, Bindu K Vasu, Lakshmi Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sunil RajanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Rittick TalukdarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Pulak ToshDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Jerry PaulDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Bindu K VasuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Lakshmi KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) is the gold standard for the management of predicted difficult airway, and inappropriate sedation is a major cause leading to its failure.

aimsThe primary objective was to compare the heart rate (HR) changes that accompany AFOI following sedation with dexmedetomidine and fentanyl. Secondary objectives included comparison of changes in blood pressure, patient comfort, ease of intubation, and degree of sedation. SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: This prospective double-blinded randomized study was conducted in a tertiary care institution. SUBJECTS AND

methodsForty patients with anticipated difficult airway requiring AFOI were included in the study. Group A received dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg whereas Group B received fentanyl 2 μg/kg. After topical anesthesia of the airway, AFOI was performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Fisher's exact test, independent two-sample

resultsThe hemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups except at 1 min postintubation when fentanyl group had significantly higher HR. There were lower alertness and muscle tone scores in dexmedetomidine group. Total comfort score was significantly higher in fentanyl group. Though more patients in dexmedetomidine group showed that no reaction to intubation and more patients in fentanyl had slight grimacing, the difference was insignificant. The ease of intubation was similar in both the groups.

conclusionThough dexmedetomidine1 μg/kg and fentanyl 2 μg/kg premedication results in comparable hemodynamics and ease of intubation, in view of enhanced patient comfort, dexmedetomidine premedication is advantageous in patients with anticipated difficult airway undergoing AFOI.

Indexed as

Conscious sedationdexmedetomidinefentanylfiberoptichemodynamicsintubationpremedication

Identifiers

PMID29628546
PMCPMC5872845
OpenAlexW2765556181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.