Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29628220›Full record

ArticleJournal of nutrition education and behavior

A Qualitative Exploration Into the Parent-Child Feeding Relationship: How Parents of Preschoolers Divide the Responsibilities of Feeding With Their Children.

Katie A Loth, Junia Nogueira de Brito, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, Jennifer Orlet Fisher, Jerica M Berge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nutrition education and behavior. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie A LothDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Electronic address: kloth@umn.edu.
Junia Nogueira de BritoDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Dianne Neumark-SztainerDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Jennifer Orlet FisherDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Jerica M BergeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
University of Minnesota · USTemple University · US

Funding

Project EAT-IV: Eating and Activity in Adolescents and Young AdultsR01HL116892 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI NEUMARK-SZTAINER, DIANNE R · 2013 to 2016
$2.9M
An exploration of the momentary mechanisms of controlling food-related parenting practices among mothers and fathers of preschool childrenK23HD090324 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LOTH, KATIE ANN · 2017 to 2020
$473k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116892NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD090324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the extent to which parents divide responsibilities of feeding (what, when, where, how much, and whether) with their children and the factors that influence parents' approach to feeding.

designIndividual interviews.

participantsParents (n = 40) of preschoolers. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Division of feeding responsibilities; motivation for feeding approach; challenges to feeding. ANALYSIS: Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using deductive and inductive content analysis.

resultsParent's approaches to feeding varied widely. A few parents followed the Division of Responsibility approach closely. Instead, many parents gave their child more than the recommended amount of influence over what foods were served and offered children less than the recommended amount of autonomy over the whether and how much of eating. Meals and snacks were approached differently; parents exhibited less control over the timing of snacks as well as the types and amounts of foods eaten during snacks, compared with the control exhibited during meals. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data support future research to understand the impact of this framework on child health outcomes when it is adhered to on all eating occasions, including snacks. Collaboration by researchers and clinicians to explore alternative frameworks that encourage parents to provide the structure and autonomy support may enhance positive outcomes in children.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsParentingAdultChild, PreschoolEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Researchchild feedingdietary intakeDivision of Responsibilityparent feeding practicesqualitative

Identifiers

PMID29628220
PMCPMC6062462
OpenAlexW2796404777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.