Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29628014›Full record

Observational studyJournal of intensive care medicine2020

Invasive Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study in Two Tertiary Care Centers.

Hasan M Al-Dorzi, Hussam Sakkijha, Raymond Khan, Tarek Aldabbagh, Aron Toledo, Pendo Ntinika, Sameera M Al Johani, Yaseen M Arabi

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Paradigm Shift:Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Dentistry and Intensive Care Unit: A Brief Report.European journal of dentistry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hasan M Al-DorziIntensive Care Department, International Medical Research Center, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz, University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3772-8949
Hussam SakkijhaPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Raymond KhanIntensive Care Department, International Medical Research Center, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz, University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tarek AldabbaghIntensive Care Department, International Medical Research Center, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz, University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aron ToledoKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pendo NtinikaResearch Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sameera M Al JohaniLaboratory Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz, University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yaseen M ArabiIntensive Care Department, International Medical Research Center, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz, University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Fahd Medical City · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive candidiasis is not uncommon in critically ill patients but has variable epidemiology and outcomes between intensive care units (ICUs). This study evaluated the epidemiology, characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with invasive candidiasis at 6 ICUs of 2 tertiary care centers.

methodsThis was a prospective observational study of all adults admitted to 6 ICUs in 2 different hospitals between August 2012 and May 2016 and diagnosed to have invasive candidiasis by 2 intensivists according to predefined criteria. The epidemiology of isolated

resultsInvasive candidiasis was diagnosed in 162 (age 58.4 ± 18.9 years, 52.2% males, 82.1% medical admissions, and admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 24.1 ± 8.4) patients at a rate of 2.6 cases per 100 ICU admissions. On the diagnosis day, the Candida score was 2.4 ± 0.9 in invasive candidiasis compared with 1.6 ± 0.9 in

conclusionsIn critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis,

Indexed as

AdultAgedCandidaCandidiasis, InvasiveCritical Care OutcomesCritical IllnessCross InfectionFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTertiary Care Centersantifungal agentscandidiasiscritical care outcomesintensive caresepsis

Identifiers

PMID29628014
PMCPMC7222290
OpenAlexW2797591757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.