ArticleOecologia2018
Compensatory mortality in a recovering top carnivore: wolves in Wisconsin, USA (1979-2013).
Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wolves respond differently to human cues as they expand into urban landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Uncertainty and precaution in hunting wolves twice in a year: Reanalysis of Treves and Louchouarn: Reply to Stauffer et al.PloS one · 2025Article
- Changing the Tolerance of the Intolerant: Does Large Carnivore Policy Matter?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Uncertainty and precaution in hunting wolves twice in a year: Reanalysis of Treves and Louchouarn.PloS one · 2024Article
- The ecology of human-caused mortality for a protected large carnivore.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- A hierarchical model for jointly assessing ecological and anthropogenic impacts on animal demography.The Journal of animal ecology · 2022Article
- Quantifying anthropogenic wolf mortality in relation to hunting regulations and landscape attributes across North America.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Poaching of protected wolves fluctuated seasonally and with non-wolf hunting.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluating how lethal management affects poaching of Mexican wolves.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Quantifying the effects of delisting wolves after the first state began lethal management.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Liberalizing the killing of endangered wolves was associated with more disappearances of collared individuals in Wisconsin, USA.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Territorial landscapes: incorporating density-dependence into wolf habitat selection studies.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Populations of large terrestrial carnivores are in various stages of recovery worldwide and the question of whether there is compensation in mortality sources is relevant to conservation. Here, we show variation in Wisconsin wolf survival from 1979 to 2013 by jointly estimating the hazard of wolves' radio-telemetry ending (endpoint) and endpoint cause. In previous analyses, wolves lost to radio-telemetry follow-up (collar loss) were censored from analysis, thereby assuming collar loss was unconfounded with mortality. Our approach allowed us to explicitly estimate hazard due to collar loss and did not require censoring these records from analysis. We found mean annual survival was 76% and mean annual causes of mortality were illegal killing (9.4%), natural and unknown causes (9.5%), and other human-caused mortality such as hunting, vehicle collisions and lethal control (5.1%). Illegal killing and natural mortality were highest during winter, causing wolf survival to decrease relative to summer. Mortality was highest during early recovery and lowest during a period of sustained population growth. Wolves again experienced higher risk of human-caused mortality relative to natural mortality as wolves expanded into areas with more human activity. We detected partial compensation in human- and natural-caused mortality since 2004 as the population saturated more available habitat. Prior to 2004, we detected additivity in mortality sources. Assessments of wolf survival and cause of mortality rates and the finding of partial compensation in mortality sources will inform wolf conservation and management efforts by identifying sources and sinks, finding areas of conservation need, and assessing management zone delineation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29627957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.