Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29627887›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2018

Clinical application of multicolour scanning laser imaging in diabetic retinopathy.

Shuting Li, Xiangning Wang, Xinhua Du, Qiang Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuting LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xiangning WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xinhua DuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Qiang WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China. qiang.wu@shsmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-3791
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai University · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 16DZ0501100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the visualization of the lesions of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using multicolour scanning laser imaging (MSLI) and conventional colour fundus photography (CFP). The paired images of diabetic patients who underwent same-day MSLI and CFP examinations were reviewed. Combined multicolour (MC) images were acquired simultaneously using three laser wavelengths: blue reflectance (BR, λ = 488 nm), green reflectance (GR, λ = 518 nm) and infrared reflectance (IR, λ = 820 nm). The number of positive DR lesions was calculated using fundus fluorescein angiography as the reference standard. The visibility of the microaneurysms (Mas) was graded using a scale, and the number of Mas for each method was counted by two masked readers. Eighty eyes of 42 diabetic patients were included. The average grading score for Mas visualization was significantly higher with MC (1.50 ± 0.71) and GR (1.55 ± 0.69) than with CFP (0.95 ± 0.81). The average number of Mas was also significantly higher with MC (11.41 ± 14.02) and GR (11.93 ± 13.43) than with CFP (6.43 ± 9.39). The number of positive Mas, diabetic macular edema (DME) and epiretinal membranes (ERM) were significantly higher with MC than CFP (P < 0.05), while the numbers of cotton wool spots, haemorrhages, hard exudates, venous beading and abnormal new vessels were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Mas and ERM were most effectively detected on GR images, and an elevated greenish shift was clearly visualized in patients with DME on the MC images. MSLI can effectively visualize Mas and other pathological lesions of DR compared with CFP. MSLI with superior resolution may be a useful complement for DME and ERM detection.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalLasersColorDiabetic RetinopathyExudates and TransudatesFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotographyReproducibility of ResultsColour fundus photographyConfocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopeDiabetic retinopathyFluorescein angiographyMulticolour scanning laser imaging

Identifiers

PMID29627887
OpenAlexW2795738567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.