ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2018
Advances in Treatment of Cardiac Amyloid.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis and Aortic Stenosis: Connection and Therapeutic Implications.Current cardiology reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Incidental detection of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Clinical implications of atrial natriuretic peptide amyloidosis.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Amyloidosis and 30-Day Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Study.JACC. CardioOncology · 2020Article
- A histopathologic schema to quantify the burden of cardiac amyloidosis: Relationship with survival and echocardiographic parameters.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic amyloidosis represents a complex group of diseases with a common feature characterized by misfolded autologous proteins depositing into tissues or organs throughout the body. Light chain amyloidosis (AL) and transthyretin (TTR) amyloid are the two most prevalent forms of this disease that commonly results in cardiac amyloidosis. In both of these conditions, the myocardium is a frequent site of infiltration and end-organ involvement often with devastating consequences. With cardiac amyloidosis becoming an increasingly identified disease that has previously been under-recognized, the purpose of this comprehensive review is to focus on the diagnosis and treatment of these two types of cardiac amyloidosis including a contemporary update on currently available therapies being investigated in clinical trials. Subsequently, we will detail potential therapeutic efficacy and limitations of these regimens, and then complete the review by highlighting newer treatment modalities. A high-level overview of modern therapeutic approaches for AL amyloid includes targeted therapies directed at reducing the production of precursor proteins and inhibitors intended to limit the deposition of fibrils in tissues. In the case of TTR amyloid, current therapy is focused on stabilization of TTR proteins, suppression of protein formation, and blocking the deposition of amyloid fibrils in tissue. Novel therapies are focused on removing amyloid fibril deposition from affected tissues. In summary, cardiac amyloidosis is a progressively devastating disease requiring swift recognition and treatment now with groundbreaking therapies on the horizon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.