Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29627863›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

The codesign of an interdisciplinary team-based intervention regarding initiating palliative care in pediatric oncology.

Douglas L Hill, Jennifer K Walter, Jessica A Casas, Concetta DiDomenico, Julia E Szymczak, Chris Feudtner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Douglas L HillRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Room 11123, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jennifer K WalterRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Room 11123, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jessica A CasasTexas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Concetta DiDomenicoRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Room 11123, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Julia E SzymczakPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Chris FeudtnerRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Room 11123, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. feudtner@email.chop.edu.

Funding

Pediatric Cancer Interdisciplinary Team Training for Regoaling CARE DiscussionsR21CA198049 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI FEUDTNER, JOHN CHRIS · 2015 to 2016
$402k
National Cancer Institute Grant R21CA198049-02NCI NIH HHS R21 CA198049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChildren with advanced cancer are often not referred to palliative or hospice care before they die or are only referred close to the child's death. The goals of the current project were to learn about pediatric oncology team members' perspectives on palliative care, to collaborate with team members to modify and tailor three separate interdisciplinary team-based interventions regarding initiating palliative care, and to assess the feasibility of this collaborative approach.

methodsWe used a modified version of experience-based codesign (EBCD) involving members of the pediatric palliative care team and three interdisciplinary pediatric oncology teams (Bone Marrow Transplant, Neuro-Oncology, and Solid Tumor) to review and tailor materials for three team-based interventions. Eleven pediatric oncology team members participated in four codesign sessions to discuss their experiences with initiating palliative care and to review the proposed intervention including patient case studies, techniques for managing uncertainty and negative emotions, role ambiguity, system-level barriers, and team communication and collaboration.

resultsThe codesign process showed that the participants were strong supporters of palliative care, members of different teams had preferences for different materials that would be appropriate for their teams, and that while participants reported frustration with timing of palliative care, they had difficulty suggesting how to change current practices.

conclusionsThe current project demonstrated the feasibility of collaborating with pediatric oncology clinicians to develop interventions about introducing palliative care. The procedures and results of this project will be posted online so that other institutions can use them as a model for developing similar interventions appropriate for their needs.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient Care TeamCommunicationExperience-based codesignInterdisciplinary collaborationPediatric oncologyPediatric palliative careRole ambiguityTeam interventionsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID29627863
PMCPMC6379076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.