ArticlePsychological research2019
Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?
Article in Psychological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- From intention to perception: how social context and personality shape affordance effects.Psychological research · 2026Article
- The impact of object affordance activation level on cognitive processing of tools.Cognitive processing · 2026Article
- Mime Initiation Latency for Object Photographs: A Behavioral Motor Norm.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2026Article
- Reliable affordances: A generative modeling approach for test-retest reliability of the affordances task.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- The different effects of breaking an object at different time points.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Restricting movements of lower face leaves recognition of emotional vocalizations intact but introduces a valence positivity bias.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Does a look of fear prompt to act? The effects of gaze and face emotional expression on manipulable objects.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Corrigendum: Exploring the Role of Action Consequences in the Handle-Response Compatibility Effect.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Correspondence effect driven by salient visual asymmetries in integral object stimuli.Psychological research · 2020Article
- Exploring the Role of Action Consequences in the Handle-Response Compatibility Effect.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account.Psychological research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated whether in a stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) task affordance effects in response to picture of graspable objects emerge when these objects appear as already grasped. It also assessed whether the observed effects could be explained as due to spatial compatibility between the most salient part in the object/display and the hand of response rather than to action potentiation. To this aim, we conducted three behavioural experiments in which participants were required to discriminate the vertical orientation (upright vs. inverted) of an object presented in the centre of the screen, while ignoring the right-left orientation of its handle. The object could be presented alone, as already grasped, as partially masked (Experiment 1) or with a human hand close to its graspable side (Experiment 2). In addition, to assess the role of perceptual salience, the object could be presented with a human hand or a non-biological (a geometrical shape) distractor located opposite to the object's graspable side. Results showed faster responses when the object's handle was located on the same side of the responding hand with a larger effect when upright objects were shown as already grasped (Experiment 1) or when a hand was displayed close to its handle (Experiment 2), and a smaller reversed effect when the hand or the geometrical shape was located opposite to the handled side (Experiment 3). We interpreted these findings as indicating that handle orientation effects emerging in SRC tasks may result from the interplay between motor affordance and spatial compatibility mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29627857What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.