ArticleBMJ open2018
Transdisciplinary research for impact: protocol for a realist evaluation of the relationship between transdisciplinary research collaboration and knowledge translation.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration.Qualitative health research · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of Saudi dental journals from time of inception to 2023.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- Mapping out the bibliometric characteristics ofJournal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- Practices of Self-Care in Healthy Old Age: A Field Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- How transdisciplinary research teams learn to do knowledge translation (KT), and how KT in turn impacts transdisciplinary research: a realist evaluation and longitudinal case study.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Strategic Team Science Promotes Collaboration and Practice-Based Research at the Research Centers in Minority Institutions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Research protocol for impact assessment of a project to scale up food policies in the Pacific.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Bringing Transdisciplinary Aging Research From Theory to Practice.The Gerontologist · 2022Article
- Towards a unifying caring life-course theory for better self-care and caring solutions: A discussion paper.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Article
- A bibliometric analysis of top 100 most-cited articles in dentistry with author(s) affiliated with Taiwan institutes.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Article
- Environmental health research and the COVID-19 pandemic: A turning point towards sustainability.Environmental research · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Developing "My Asthma Diary": a process exemplar of a patient-driven arts-based knowledge translation tool.BMC pediatrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransdisciplinary teams are increasingly regarded as integral to conducting effective research. Similarly, knowledge translation is often seen as a solution to improving the relevance and benefits of health research. Yet, whether, how, for whom and under which circumstances transdisciplinary research influences knowledge translation is undertheorised, which limits its potential impact. The proposed research aims to identify the contexts and mechanisms by which transdisciplinary research contributes to developing shared understandings and behaviours of knowledge translation between team members. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using a longitudinal case-study design approach to realist evaluation, we outline a study protocol examining whether, how, if and for whom transdisciplinary collaboration can impact knowledge translation understandings and behaviours within a 5-year transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence. Data are being collected between February 2017 and December 2020 over four rounds of theory development, refinement and testing using interviews, observation, document review and visual elicitation as data sources. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Health Research Ethics Committee of the University of Adelaide approved this study. Findings will be communicated with team members at scheduled intervals throughout the study verbally and by means of creative reflective approaches (eg, arts elicitation, journalling). This research will be used to help support optimal team functioning by identifying strategies to support knowledge sharing and communication within and beyond the team to facilitate attainment of research objectives. Academic dissemination will occur through publication and presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.