ArticleNeuroImage2019
Organization of area hV5/MT+ in subjects with homonymous visual field defects.
Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical response to transient and long-term visual field loss.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Pathways Mediating Blindsight After V1 Injury: A Systematic Review of Human and Monkey Studies.Basic and clinical neuroscience · 2025Review
- Individualized functional magnetic resonance imaging neuromodulation enhances visuospatial perception: a proof-of-concept study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- The Role of Population Receptive Field Sizes in Higher-Order Visual Dysfunction.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- A Scientific Approach to Conscious Experience, Introspection, and Unconscious Processing: Vision and Blindsight.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Visual Motion Coherence Responses in Human Visual Cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Spared perilesional V1 activity underlies training-induced recovery of luminance detection sensitivity in cortically-blind patients.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Visual Field Reconstruction in Hemianopia Using fMRI Based Mapping Techniques.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Functional MRI of visual cortex predicts training-induced recovery in stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Article
- Convergence Along the Visual Hierarchy Is Altered in Posterior Cortical Atrophy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Article
- Studying Cortical Plasticity in Ophthalmic and Neurological Disorders: From Stimulus-Driven to Cortical Circuitry Modeling Approaches.Neural plasticity · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) leads to a visual field loss (scotoma) in the retinotopically corresponding part of the visual field. Nonetheless, a small amount of residual visual sensitivity persists within the blind field. This residual capacity has been linked to activity observed in the middle temporal area complex (V5/MT+). However, it remains unknown whether the organization of hV5/MT+ changes following early visual cortical lesions. We studied the organization of area hV5/MT+ of five patients with dense homonymous defects in a quadrant of the visual field as a result of partial V1+ or optic radiation lesions. To do so, we developed a new method, which models the boundaries of population receptive fields directly from the BOLD signal of each voxel in the visual cortex. We found responses in hV5/MT+ arising inside the scotoma for all patients and identified two possible sources of activation: 1) responses might originate from partially lesioned parts of area V1 corresponding to the scotoma, and 2) responses can also originate independent of area V1 input suggesting the existence of functional V1-bypassing pathways. Apparently, visually driven activity observed in hV5/MT+ is not sufficient to mediate conscious vision. More surprisingly, visually driven activity in corresponding regions of V1 and early extrastriate areas including hV5/MT+ did not guarantee visual perception in the group of patients with post-geniculate lesions that we examined. This suggests that the fine coordination of visual activity patterns across visual areas may be an important determinant of whether visual perception persists following visual cortical lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.