Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29626738›Full record

ArticleValue in health regional issues2018

Return on Investment Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening and Downstaging in Egypt: Implications for Developing Countries.

Alena N Skrundevskiy, Omar S Omar, Jungyoon Kim, Amr S Soliman, Theodore A Korolchuk, Fernando A Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health regional issues, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Return on Investment of a Breast Cancer Screening Program in Tanzania: Opportunity for Patient and Public Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cancer screening: the collateral damage of the pandemic in Egypt.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Burden of Obesity in Egypt.Frontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alena N SkrundevskiyUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, Department of Health Services Research and Administration, Omaha, NE, USA.
Omar S OmarCairo University, School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Cairo, Egypt.
Jungyoon KimUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, Department of Health Services Research and Administration, Omaha, NE, USA. Electronic address: jungyoon.kim@unmc.edu.
Amr S SolimanDepartment of Community Health and Social Medicine, School of Medicine, City University of New York, New York, NY.
Theodore A KorolchukGreenfield Development, Hong Kong.
Fernando A WilsonUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, Department of Health Services Research and Administration, Omaha, NE, USA.

Funding

Cancer Epidemiology Education in Special Populations Program-15R25CA112383 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Amr Soliman · 2006 to 2026
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA112383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to perform a return-on-investment (ROI) analysis of a breast cancer screening program in Egypt by comparing net profit in treatment costs saved to program cost investment.

methodsThe breast cancer downstaging program targeted women living in an Egyptian slum, where residents have low access to health care. Program costs were estimated by using data from interviews with program administrative staff. Screening and treatment costs were estimated by using Ministry of Health medical reimbursement data. Estimates for expected rates of downstaging were modeled on the basis of data from a previous study. ROI, or relative cost savings, was calculated by comparing treatment cost savings to costs for the screening program. A baseline ROI for facility-based screening was calculated, followed by ROIs for different scenarios.

resultsAverage per-person treatment cost for screened and unscreened patients was estimated to be $28,632 and $58,170, respectively, with a cumulative lifetime risk of 6.36%. Total screening program cost per person was $112.10. The study estimated an expected decrease in late-stage breast cancer diagnosis by 13.7% as a result of the screening program, saving $4,049 in treatment costs per individual diagnosed. The analysis resulted in a positive ROI of 133% for facility-based screening.

conclusionsBreast cancer represents an increasing burden on health care in Egypt and other developing countries. This study concludes that a community-based downstaging program resulted in a positive ROI, or overall cost-savings. The findings inform that policymakers in low-income and middle-income countries may consider implementing community-based downstaging programs for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsHealth Care CostsBreast NeoplasmsDeveloping CountriesEarly Detection of CancerEgyptFemaleHumansPovertyProgram Evaluationbreast cancercancer screeningcommunitydeveloping countriesdownstagingEgyptreturn-on-investment

Identifiers

PMID29626738
PMCPMC7770629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.