Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29626294›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2018

Routine immunohistochemical staining in membranous nephropathy: in situ detection of phospholipase A2 receptor and thrombospondin type 1 containing 7A domain.

Vincenzo L'Imperio, Federico Pieruzzi, Renato Alberto Sinico, Manuela Nebuloni, Antonio Granata, Andrew Smith, Antonella Radice, Fabio Pagni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vincenzo L'ImperioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Federico PieruzziNephrology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Renato Alberto SinicoNephrology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Manuela NebuloniDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Antonio GranataDepartment of Nephrology, San Giovanni Di Dio Hospital, Agrigento, Italy.
Andrew SmithProteomics and Metabolomics Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Antonella RadiceMicrobiology and Virology Department, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Fabio PagniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy. fabio.pagni@unimib.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMembranous nephropathy (MN) can be idiopathic (iMN) or manifest as a result of systemic underlying conditions as a secondary epiphenomenon. For the prognostic and predictive consequences of this discrimination, the routine use of reliable markers is crucial. This large MN series aimed to evaluate the routine and standardized immunohistochemical (IHC) employment of a panel of 3 biomarkers-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R), thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A), and immunoglobulin (Ig)G4-in the differential diagnosis of MN forms, contributing to the validation of the technique and the correct interpretation of reproducible patterns of reactivity.

methodsWe classified 95 patients with a biopsy proven diagnosis of MN as primary (n = 72) or secondary (n = 23) cases based on clinical data. After performing an IHC assay directed against PLA2R, THSD7A and IgG4 antigens, samples were interpreted by three different nephropathologists to assess the positivity/negativity of the staining according to new interpretation criteria.

resultsUseful interpretation criteria were introduced to exclude false positive patterns of reactivity and to identify only true granular membranous or mesangial deposits in MN. The IHC directed against PLA2R resulted positive in 51 iMN cases and negative in 21, while 4/23 secondary forms were considered positive. Based on these data the technique showed a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 83%. On the other hand, the IHC analysis for IgG4 resulted positive in 44 cases of iMN and negative in 28 cases, while only 4/23 secondary forms were positive (same cases positive to PLA2R). Finally, THSD7A was found to be positive only in 1 case, which was negative to PLA2R and IgG4. The combination of the results allowed a classification of the series into two major groups: "double-positive" (PLA2R+/IgG4+/THSD7A-) and "triple-negative" (PLA2R-/IgG4-/THSD7A-) cases.

conclusionsBased on these data, the diagnostic performance of the three biomarkers used in a "tandem fashion" can reach 79% sensitivity and 83% specificity, significantly reducing the risk of a false-positive or false-negative result and improving the routine characterization of this frequent glomerulonephritis.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleGlomerulonephritis, MembranousHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Phospholipase A2Retrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityStaining and LabelingThrombospondinsBiomarkersImmunoglobulin GReceptors, Phospholipase A2ThrombospondinsTHSD7A protein, humanMembranous nephropathyPLA2RTHSD7A

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.