Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29626291›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2018

Comparing the performance of meta-classifiers-a case study on selected imbalanced data sets relevant for prediction of liver toxicity.

Sankalp Jain, Eleni Kotsampasakou, Gerhard F Ecker

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Allosteric Binders of ACE2 Are Promising Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Agents.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2022
    Article
  7. Allosteric binders of ACE2 are promising anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. HybridACS pharmacology & translational science · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CombiningChemical research in toxicology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An In Silico Model for Predicting Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sankalp JainDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Eleni KotsampasakouDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard F EckerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria. gerhard.f.ecker@univie.ac.at.
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF F 3502Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cheminformatics datasets used in classification problems, especially those related to biological or physicochemical properties, are often imbalanced. This presents a major challenge in development of in silico prediction models, as the traditional machine learning algorithms are known to work best on balanced datasets. The class imbalance introduces a bias in the performance of these algorithms due to their preference towards the majority class. Here, we present a comparison of the performance of seven different meta-classifiers for their ability to handle imbalanced datasets, whereby Random Forest is used as base-classifier. Four different datasets that are directly (cholestasis) or indirectly (via inhibition of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 and 1B3) related to liver toxicity were chosen for this purpose. The imbalance ratio in these datasets ranges between 4:1 and 20:1 for negative and positive classes, respectively. Three different sets of molecular descriptors for model development were used, and their performance was assessed in 10-fold cross-validation and on an independent validation set. Stratified bagging, MetaCost and CostSensitiveClassifier were found to be the best performing among all the methods. While MetaCost and CostSensitiveClassifier provided better sensitivity values, Stratified Bagging resulted in high balanced accuracies.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDatasets as TopicAlgorithmsAnimalsCholestasisHumansLiverMachine LearningOrganic Anion Transport Protein 1Organic Anion Transport Protein 1Classification modelCost sensitive classifierImbalanced datasetsMachine learningMeta-classifiersStratified bagging

Identifiers

PMID29626291
PMCPMC5919997
OpenAlexW2800344222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.