Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29626253›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2018

Interobserver variability in the H&E-based assessment of tumor budding in pT3/4 colon cancer: does it affect the prognostic relevance?

Benedikt Martin, Eva Schäfer, Elzbieta Jakubowicz, Patrick Mayr, Regina Ihringer, Matthias Anthuber, Gerhard Schenkirsch, Tina Schaller, Bruno Märkl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improving tumor budding reporting in colorectal cancer: a Delphi consensus study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Tumor proportion in colon cancer: results from a semiautomatic image analysis approach.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benedikt MartinInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany. benedikt.martin@klinikum-augsburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2314-3261
Eva SchäferInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Elzbieta JakubowiczInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Patrick MayrInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Regina IhringerInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Matthias AnthuberDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Gerhard SchenkirschClinical and Population-Based Cancer Registry Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Tina SchallerInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Bruno MärklInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
University Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

Hermann-Egger Foundation A local social foundation in Augsburg which supports also science projects
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor budding is a mostly accepted adverse prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma. It is on the cusp of a widespread use after agreement was reached recently on uniform assessment criteria. We investigated whether the interobserver variability has a direct influence on the prognostic relevance in pT3/4 colon cancer in the background of different levels of experience of the investigators. In total, six investigators with different levels of experience evaluated tumor budding on H&E slides in 244 cases with primary diagnosed (2002-2011) colon carcinoma (pT3/4, N+/-, M0). High-grade tumor budding/budding grade 3 (defined as majority assessment among the investigators) was significantly associated with an adverse outcome (overall survival p = 0.03, cancer-specific survival p = 0.08) and the occurrence of distant metastasis (p = 0.009). However, a detailed analysis of the rating results of the individual investigators revealed that only ratings of one investigator (advanced resident) were associated with an adverse outcome (p = 0.01 cancer-specific survival, overall survival p = 0.09, distant metastasis p = 0.002). The results of another investigator (consultant) were significantly associated with distant metastasis (p = 0.007). The kappa values among the investigators have a range between 0.077 and 0.357 (median 0.166). Total agreement of all investigators existed in 109 cases (44.7%). Our results demonstrate that the evaluation of tumor budding on H&E slides in pT3/4 colon cancer goes along with a considerable interobserver variability among investigators of different levels of experience. Furthermore, our results reveal that these findings directly influence the prognostic value.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingObserver VariationPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsStaining and LabelingColon cancerHistologyInterobserver variabilityPrognostic factorTumor budding

Identifiers

PMID29626253
OpenAlexW2802170880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.