ReviewGenome research2018
Recognition of the polycistronic nature of human genes is critical to understanding the genotype-phenotype relationship.
Review in Genome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Cell type-specific expression and subcellular localization of the human insulin upstream open reading frame (INSU) protein in pancreatic β-cells.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Identification of unannotated microproteins involved in endothelial cell homeostasis, dysfunction, and vascular disease.Cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Degradation Determinants Are Abundant in Human Noncanonical Proteins and Minor Annotated Isoforms.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- The 'non-conventional' peptidome: A new layer in plant regulatory mechanisms.Plant communications · 2025Review
- Eukaryotic Microproteins.Annual review of biochemistry · 2025Review
- Proteomics Can Rise to the Challenge of Pseudogenes' Coding Nature.Journal of proteome research · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- An Inner Mitochondrial Membrane Microprotein from the SLC35A4 Upstream ORF Regulates Cellular Metabolism.Journal of molecular biology · 2024Article
- Updating mRNA variants of the human RSK4 gene and their expression in different stressed situations.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Microproteins-Discovery, structure, and function.Proteomics · 2023Review
- All these screens that we've done: how functional genetic screens have informed our understanding of ribosome biogenesis.Bioscience reports · 2023Review
- Chemical labeling and proteomics for characterization of unannotated small and alternative open reading frame-encoded polypeptides.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023Review
- Newfound Coding Potential of Transcripts Unveils Missing Members of Human Protein Communities.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- OpenCustomDB: Integration of Unannotated Open Reading Frames and Genetic Variants to Generate More Comprehensive Customized Protein Databases.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- BONCAT-based Profiling of Nascent Small and Alternative Open Reading Frame-encoded Proteins.Bio-protocol · 2023Article
- Re-evaluating the impact of alternative RNA splicing on proteomic diversity.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Peptidomics Methods Applied to the Study of Flower Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technological advances promise unprecedented opportunities for whole exome sequencing and proteomic analyses of populations. Currently, data from genome and exome sequencing or proteomic studies are searched against reference genome annotations. This provides the foundation for research and clinical screening for genetic causes of pathologies. However, current genome annotations substantially underestimate the proteomic information encoded within a gene. Numerous studies have now demonstrated the expression and function of alternative (mainly small, sometimes overlapping) ORFs within mature gene transcripts. This has important consequences for the correlation of phenotypes and genotypes. Most alternative ORFs are not yet annotated because of a lack of evidence, and this absence from databases precludes their detection by standard proteomic methods, such as mass spectrometry. Here, we demonstrate how current approaches tend to overlook alternative ORFs, hindering the discovery of new genetic drivers and fundamental research. We discuss available tools and techniques to improve identification of proteins from alternative ORFs and finally suggest a novel annotation system to permit a more complete representation of the transcriptomic and proteomic information contained within a gene. Given the crucial challenge of distinguishing functional ORFs from random ones, the suggested pipeline emphasizes both experimental data and conservation signatures. The addition of alternative ORFs in databases will render identification less serendipitous and advance the pace of research and genomic knowledge. This review highlights the urgent medical and research need to incorporate alternative ORFs in current genome annotations and thus permit their inclusion in hypotheses and models, which relate phenotypes and genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.