Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29625562›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2018

Development and testing of an online community care platform for frail older adults in the Netherlands: a user-centred design.

Sarah Willard, Ger Cremers, Yan Ping Man, Erik van Rossum, Marieke Spreeuwenberg, Luc de Witte

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Interdisciplinary communication and collaboration as key to improved nutritional care of malnourished older adults across health-care settings - A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah WillardCentre of Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Henri Dunantstraat 2, 6419PB, Heerlen, The Netherlands. sarah.willard@zuyd.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1580-6643
Ger CremersCentre of Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Henri Dunantstraat 2, 6419PB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Yan Ping ManCentre of Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Henri Dunantstraat 2, 6419PB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Erik van RossumCentre of Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Henri Dunantstraat 2, 6419PB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Marieke SpreeuwenbergCentre of Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Henri Dunantstraat 2, 6419PB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Luc de WitteCentre of Innovative Care and Technology (EIZT), Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Henri Dunantstraat 2, 6419PB, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent transitions in long-term care in the Netherlands have major consequences for community-dwelling older adults. A new paradigm expects them to manage and arrange their own care and support as much as possible. Technology can support this shift. A study has been conducted to explore the needs of community-dwelling frail older adults with regard to an online platform. An existing platform was subsequently modified, based upon these needs, resulting in an online community care platform (OCC-platform) comprising of care, health, and communication functions. The purpose of this platform was to support frail older adults in their independence and functioning, by stimulating self-care and providing reliable information, products and services.

methodsThe study used a User-Centred Design. The development processes involved the following steps: Step 1) Identification of the User Requirements. To assess the user requirements, direct observations (N = 3) and interviews (N = 14) were performed. Step 2) Modification of an Existing Online Platform. Based upon Step 1, available online platforms were explored to determine whether an existing useful product was available. Two companies collaborated in modifying such a platform; Step 3) Testing the Modified Platform. A total of 73 older adults were invited to test a prototype of the OCC-platform during 6 months, which comprised of two phases: (1) a training phase; and (2) a testing phase.

resultsAn iterative process of modifications resulted in an interactive software concept on a Standard PC, containing 11 Functions. The Functions of 'contacts', 'services' and 'messaging', were by far, the most frequently used. The use was at its highest during the first 2 weeks of the testing and then its use steadily declined. The vast majority of the subjects (94%) were positive about the usability of the platform. Only a minority of the subjects (27%) indicated that the platform had added value for them.

conclusionThe overall prospect was that an OCC-platform can contribute to the social participation and the self-management competencies of frail older adults, together with their social cohesion in the community. In order to validate these prospects, further research is needed on the characteristics and the impact of online platforms.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansIndependent LivingMaleMorbidityNetherlandsSocial ParticipationAgeing, frailtyCareCommunity dwellingICTOnline community

Identifiers

PMID29625562
PMCPMC5889547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.