Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29625556›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genetics2018

Targeted next generation sequencing with an extended gene panel does not impact variant detection in mitochondrial diseases.

Morgane Plutino, Annabelle Chaussenot, Cécile Rouzier, Samira Ait-El-Mkadem, Konstantina Fragaki, Véronique Paquis-Flucklinger, Sylvie Bannwarth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Tackling Dysfunction of Mitochondrial Bioenergetics in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. A novel variant m.8561C>T in the overlapping region ofMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Morgane PlutinoUniversité Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0222-5479
Annabelle ChaussenotUniversité Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France.
Cécile RouzierUniversité Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France.
Samira Ait-El-MkademUniversité Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France.
Konstantina FragakiUniversité Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France.
Véronique Paquis-FlucklingerUniversité Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France. paquis@unice.fr.
Sylvie BannwarthUniversité Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France. bannwarth@unice.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the advent of next generation sequencing (NGS), several studies have tried to evaluate the relevance of targeted gene panel sequencing and whole exome sequencing for molecular diagnosis of mitochondrial diseases. The comparison between these different strategies is extremely difficult. A recent study analysed a cohort of patients affected by a mitochondrial disease using a NGS approach based on a targeted gene panel including 132 genes. This strategy led to identify the causative mutations in 15.2% of cases. The number of novel genes responsible for respiratory chain deficiency increases very rapidly.

methodsIn order to determine the impact of larger panels used as a first screening strategy on molecular diagnosis success, we analysed a cohort of 80 patients affected by a mitochondrial disease with a first mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) NGS screening and secondarily a targeted mitochondrial panel of 281 nuclear genes.

resultsPathogenic mtDNA abnormalities were identified in 4.1% (1/24) of children and 25% (14/56) of adult patients. The remaining 65 patients were analysed with our targeted mitochondrial panel and this approach enabled us to achieve an identification rate of 21.7% (5/23) in children versus 7.1% (3/42) in adults.

conclusionsOur results confirm that larger gene panels do not improve diagnostic yield of mitochondrial diseases due to (i) their very high genetic heterogeneity, (ii) the ongoing discovery of novel genes and (iii) mutations in genes apparently not related to mitochondrial function that lead to secondary respiratory chain deficiency.

Indexed as

AgedChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedMitochondrial DiseasesMitochondrial ProteinsNuclear ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNAMitochondrial ProteinsNuclear ProteinsExomeMitochondrial disordersNext generation sequencingTargeted panel

Identifiers

PMID29625556
PMCPMC5889585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.