Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29625234›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2019

Baby brain atlases.

Kenichi Oishi, Linda Chang, Hao Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A detailed spatiotemporal atlas of the white matter tracts for the fetal brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Developmental Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenichi OishiDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: koishi2@jhmi.edu.
Linda ChangDepartments of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, and Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Hao HuangDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at CHOP/PennU54HD086984 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI SCHULTZ, ROBERT THOMAS · 2016 to 2020
$6.3M
Structural Development of Human Fetal BrainR01MH092535 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HUANG, HAO · 2011 to 2020
$4.6M
Development of quantitative MRI DTI analysis tool for preterm neonateR01HD065955 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI OISHI, KENICHI · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065955NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD086984NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The baby brain is constantly changing due to its active neurodevelopment, and research into the baby brain is one of the frontiers in neuroscience. To help guide neuroscientists and clinicians in their investigation of this frontier, maps of the baby brain, which contain a priori knowledge about neurodevelopment and anatomy, are essential. "Brain atlas" in this review refers to a 3D-brain image with a set of reference labels, such as a parcellation map, as the anatomical reference that guides the mapping of the brain. Recent advancements in scanners, sequences, and motion control methodologies enable the creation of various types of high-resolution baby brain atlases. What is becoming clear is that one atlas is not sufficient to characterize the existing knowledge about the anatomical variations, disease-related anatomical alterations, and the variations in time-dependent changes. In this review, the types and roles of the human baby brain MRI atlases that are currently available are described and discussed, and future directions in the field of developmental neuroscience and its clinical applications are proposed. The potential use of disease-based atlases to characterize clinically relevant information, such as clinical labels, in addition to conventional anatomical labels, is also discussed.

Indexed as

Atlases as TopicBrainFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingBrain atlasEarly developmentInfantNeonatePrenatal exposurePreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID29625234
PMCPMC6170732
OpenAlexW2795942562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.