ArticleJournal of immunological methods2018
Automated generation of immature dendritic cells in a single-use system.
Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Manufacturing Dendritic Cells for Immunotherapy: Monocyte Enrichment.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020Review
- Effect of Monocyte Seeding Density on Dendritic Cell Generation in an Automated Perfusion-Based Culture System.Biochemical engineering journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) are an indispensable part of studying human responses that are important for protective immunity against cancer and infectious diseases as well as prevention of autoimmunity and transplant rejection. These cells are also key elements of personalized vaccines for cancer and infectious diseases. Despite the vital role of DCs in both clinical and basic research contexts, methods for obtaining these cells from individuals remains a comparatively under-developed and inefficient process. DCs are present in very low concentrations (<1%) in blood, thus they must be generated from monocytes and the current methodology in DC generation involves a laborious process of static culture and stimulation with cytokines contained in culture medium. Herein, we describe an automated fluidic system, MicroDEN, that allows for differentiation of monocytes into immature-DCs (iDCs) utilizing continuous perfusion of differentiation media. Manual steps associated with current ex vivo monocyte differentiation are vastly reduced and an aseptic environment is ensured by the use of an enclosed cartridge and tubing network. Benchmark phenotyping was performed on the generated iDCs along with allogeneic T-cell proliferation and syngeneic antigen-specific functional assays. MicroDEN generated iDCs were phenotypically and functionally similar to well plate generated iDCs, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of utilizing MicroDEN in the broad range of applications requiring DCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.