Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29625077›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2018

Optimising the collection of female genital tract fluid for cytokine analysis in pregnant women.

C S Short, R Quinlan, P Bennett, R J Shattock, G P Taylor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C S ShortImperial College London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.short@imperial.ac.uk.
R QuinlanImperial College London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
P BennettImperial College London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
R J ShattockImperial College London, United Kingdom.
G P TaylorImperial College London, United Kingdom; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health NG0215Wellcome Trust WT102757/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo better understand the immunology of pregnancy, study of female genital tract fluid (FGF) is desirable. However the optimum method of collection of FGF in pregnant women for immunological methods, specifically cytokine measurement, is unknown.

methodsA prospective study of HIV-uninfected pregnant women comparing two methods of FGF collection: polyvinyl acetal sponge collection of cervical fluid (CF) and menstrual cup collection of cervicovaginal fluid (CVF). Samples were collected at 3 time points across the second and third trimesters: 14-21, 22-25 and 26-31 weeks. Multiplex chemi-luminescent assays were used to measure: IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13 and TNF-α. Optimal methodology for cytokine normalisation (sample weight, volume and total protein) was explored.

resultsAll cytokines were measurable in both fluid types. IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-6 were detected at the highest concentrations (ranking order CF > CVF > plasma). CVF collection was simpler, provided the largest volume of sample (median 0.5 g) with the potential for undiluted usage, and allowed for self-insertion. CF cytokine concentrations were intrinsically associated with sample weight and protein concentration however CVF cytokines were independent of these.

conclusionBoth methods of collection are robust for measurement of FGF cytokines during pregnancy. We recommend CVF collection using a menstrual cup as a viable option in pregnant women for high dimensional biological techniques.

Indexed as

AdultBody FluidsCervix UteriCytokinesFemaleFibroblast Growth FactorsHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSpecimen HandlingVaginaCytokinesFibroblast Growth FactorsCervicovaginal fluidCytokinesFemale genital tract fluidMenstrual cupOphthalmic spongePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29625077
PMCPMC5981004
OpenAlexW2796282192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.