ArticleCell stem cell2018
The Rules of Successful Speed Dating Are Complex, Even for Super-Enhancers.
Article in Cell stem cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Super-enhancers: a new frontier for epigenetic modifiers in cancer chemoresistance.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Super-enhancers (SEs) are important for regulating cell identity genes and oncogenes, but correctly assigning target genes to SEs is difficult. Recently in Cell Reports, Lopes Novo et al. (2018) map interactions between SEs and promoters and observe a significant rewiring of complex SE-promoter networks between different pluripotent states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29625064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.