Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29625023›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2018

Identification of Misclassified ClinVar Variants via Disease Population Prevalence.

Naisha Shah, Ying-Chen Claire Hou, Hung-Chun Yu, Rachana Sainger, C Thomas Caskey, J Craig Venter, Amalio Telenti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Clinical Features of Brugada Syndrome Patients With SCN5A Variants.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Uncovering ASO-Targetable Deep IntronicDNA and cell biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Variant Effect Prediction in the Age of Machine Learning.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. In vivo versus in silico assessment of potentially pathogenic missense variants in human reproductive genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naisha ShahHuman Longevity Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Ying-Chen Claire HouHuman Longevity Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Hung-Chun YuHuman Longevity Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Rachana SaingerHuman Longevity Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
C Thomas CaskeyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Craig VenterHuman Longevity Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA; J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: jcventer@jcvi.org.
Amalio TelentiJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: atelenti@jcvi.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a significant interest in the standardized classification of human genetic variants. We used whole-genome sequence data from 10,495 unrelated individuals to contrast population frequency of pathogenic variants to the expected population prevalence of the disease. Analyses included the ACMG-recommended 59 gene-condition sets for incidental findings and 463 genes associated with 265 OrphaNet conditions. A total of 25,505 variants were used to identify patterns of inflation (i.e., excess genetic risk and misclassification). Inflation increases as the level of evidence supporting the pathogenic nature of the variant decreases. We observed up to 11.5% of genetic disorders with inflation in pathogenic variant sets and up to 92.3% for the variant set with conflicting interpretations. This improved to 7.7% and 57.7%, respectively, after filtering for disease-specific allele frequency. The patterns of inflation were replicated using public data from more than 138,000 genomes. The burden of rare variants was a main contributing factor of the observed inflation, indicating collective misclassified rare variants. We also analyzed the dynamics of re-classification of variant pathogenicity in ClinVar over time, which indicates progressive improvement in variant classification. The study shows that databases include a significant proportion of wrongly ascertained variants; however, it underscores the critical role of ClinVar to contrast claims and foster validation across submitters.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationDiseaseGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSoftwareTime FactorsACMGClinVarOrphaNetpathogenic variantpenetranceprevalence

Identifiers

PMID29625023
PMCPMC5985337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.