Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29624858›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2018

Being targeted as a "severely overweight pregnant woman" -A qualitative interview study.

Drude S Lauridsen, Peter Sandøe, Lotte Holm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  7. Widespread misconceptions about pregnancy for women living with obesity.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  8. Being targeted as a "severely overweight pregnant woman" -A qualitative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Drude S LauridsenDepartment of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7946-3814
Peter SandøeDepartment of Food and Resource Economics, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0397-3273
Lotte HolmDepartment of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0667-7779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m

objectiveTo investigate accounts women give of their experiences of being targeted as severely overweight during pregnancy when they look back at the intervention 4-5 years later.

designInterpretive analysis based on 21 semi-structured interviews conducted 4-5 years after the pregnancy with Danish mothers categorized as having a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 30.

findingsIn the women's retrospective accounts three phases were identified and separated: (i) Being identified as a "severely overweight pregnant woman." The women differed over whether they accepted this categorization, but all believed that an approach based on weight was acceptable. (ii) Encounters with health-care professionals. The women differed here: some reported no negative experiences; others reported experiences of prejudice and silence. (iii) Reflections on long-term outcomes. Most women reported that the interventions during their pregnancies did not lead to any lasting lifestyle change. The women disagreed over whether, in principle, pregnancy was a suitable time to be targeted. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionOur study illustrates the importance of critically considering whether pregnancy is a suitable window of opportunity for obesity prevention, and shows that women's experiences should be examined in relation to each phase of intervention. More interdisciplinary studies are needed to map potential benefits and other consequences over the short- and long-term.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBody Mass IndexObesityProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrejudicePrenatal CareQualitative ResearchRetrospective Studiesobesitypregnancyprenatal carequalitativetarget groupweight stigma

Identifiers

PMID29624858
PMCPMC6186537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.